From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lute Kamstra <Lute.Kamstra.lists@xs4all.nl>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: lisp-outline-level.
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:30:21 +0100
Message-ID: <87wtta5fwy.fsf@xs4all.nl>
References: <87ekfke9hk.fsf@xs4all.nl> <E1D0w35-0003LY-Cd@fencepost.gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1108460576 32506 80.91.229.2 (15 Feb 2005 09:42:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 09:42:56 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 15 10:42:55 2005
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D0zEH-0003p1-Uc
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:42:50 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D0zU0-0003RX-1A
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 04:59:04 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D0zQt-0002m6-Bd
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 04:55:51 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D0zQq-0002kB-Ap
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 04:55:49 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D0zQp-0002US-G5
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 04:55:47 -0500
Original-Received: from [194.109.24.34] (helo=smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1D0z2E-0000fp-NU; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 04:30:23 -0500
Original-Received: from pijl (a80-127-67-124.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.127.67.124])
	by smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j1F9UMFc043548; 
	Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:30:22 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from Lute.Kamstra@xs4all.nl)
Original-Received: from lute by pijl with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1D0z2D-0000w3-00; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:30:21 +0100
Original-To: rms@gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <E1D0w35-0003LY-Cd@fencepost.gnu.org> (Richard Stallman's
	message of "Tue, 15 Feb 2005 01:19:03 -0500")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
Original-Lines: 15
X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:33467
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:33467

Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:

>     This is a bit strange as outline-regexp doesn't match
>     ";;;###autoload".  Shall I commit the patch below?
>
> Does this change give improved behavior in any particular case?
> If so, which case?
>
> What happens if you add ;;;###autoload to outline-regexp?

As Stefan Monnier suggested, I added ;;;###autoload to outline-regexp.
I also improved the efficiency of lisp-outline-level as suggested by
David Kastrup.

Lute.