From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.mail.mh-e.devel Subject: Re: Why min-colors 88? Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 21:32:33 -0500 Message-ID: <87wtg9gquv.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: <851.1138996246@olgas.newt.com> <87wtgapbup.fsf@olgas.newt.com> <877j8aj58w.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <14491.1139159149@olgas.newt.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1139193173 17558 80.91.229.2 (6 Feb 2006 02:32:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 02:32:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mh-e-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 06 03:32:50 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F5wBK-0007Hn-IN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 03:32:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F5wEb-0002TO-Tj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 21:36:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F5wER-0002TJ-QU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 21:35:59 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F5wEQ-0002T7-8K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 21:35:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F5wEQ-0002T4-4y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 21:35:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.110] (helo=tomts43-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F5wDt-0001uE-Ma for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 21:35:25 -0500 Original-Received: from alfajor ([67.71.25.142]) by tomts43-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20060206023233.LEPK23065.tomts43-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 21:32:33 -0500 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 25358D7466; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 21:32:33 -0500 (EST) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <14491.1139159149@olgas.newt.com> (Bill Wohler's message of "Sun, 05 Feb 2006 09:05:49 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:50072 gmane.mail.mh-e.devel:11583 Archived-At: > Whoops, I meant to say 88 different colors in all of its faces. Actually no. All it really means is that the automatic color-approximation algorithm used by Emacs works well enough on terminals with 88 colors and up, so that more manual fiddling has not been needed. Stefan