unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
To: rms@gnu.org
Cc: rgm@gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: NT icons
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:04:39 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wt2i5688.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1HHmjM-00065I-Iw@fencepost.gnu.org> (Richard Stallman's message of "Thu\, 15 Feb 2007 14\:57\:24 -0500")

Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:

>     That should teach us a lesson not to delete anything without a
>     good faith effort to prove that it doesn't have valid copyright
>     assignment.  Richard didn't just start being pedantic about
>     copyrights; we always checked files' assignments before a major
>     release.  So I cannot believe we have any old files in the
>     distribution that we cannot distribute.  We may have lost our
>     memory, but the files are kosher.
>
> I agree.  When something looks dubious, we shoulc check the facts
> rather than rush to delete it.

Since the chances of any infringing code showing up is so small, I
suggest leaving the remainder of the copyright audit till after the
Emacs 22 release.  It should not hold the release.

I think that after Alan's C++ misfontification fix comes in, we should
release a final pretest tarball, or even Emacs 22.1 itself.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-16 18:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-12 21:55 NT icons Chong Yidong
2007-02-12 23:34 ` Jason Rumney
2007-02-12 23:41   ` David Kastrup
2007-02-13  0:07     ` Jason Rumney
2007-02-13  0:16       ` Nick Roberts
2007-02-13 23:36         ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-13 23:36       ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-13  0:56   ` Chong Yidong
2007-02-13  9:01     ` Jason Rumney
2007-02-13 16:27 ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-14 20:25   ` Glenn Morris
2007-02-14 20:36     ` Glenn Morris
2007-02-14 21:10       ` Chong Yidong
2007-02-14 22:14         ` Glenn Morris
2007-02-16  7:45         ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-16  8:37           ` Glenn Morris
2007-02-17  1:03             ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-17  1:54               ` Glenn Morris
2007-02-14 21:23       ` Jason Rumney
2007-02-15  4:25         ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-15  4:23       ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-15 19:57         ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-16 18:04           ` Chong Yidong [this message]
2007-02-17  7:23             ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-17 11:09               ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-18  4:38                 ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-18 16:10                   ` Chong Yidong
2007-02-18 19:00                     ` David Kastrup
2007-02-19 18:04                       ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-18 19:38                     ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-19  8:21                     ` Glenn Morris
2007-02-16  0:26     ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-16  1:14       ` Glenn Morris
2007-02-16  1:28         ` Glenn Morris
2007-02-17  9:55           ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-17 10:13             ` Jason Rumney
2007-02-17 11:02               ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-17 21:02             ` Glenn Morris
2007-02-18  4:23               ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-18 16:45                 ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-18 18:28                   ` Jason Rumney
2007-02-18 21:00                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-18 21:22                       ` Andreas Schwab
2007-02-18 22:26                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-18 21:26                       ` Jason Rumney
2007-02-18 22:23                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-19 18:04                     ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-17  9:54         ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-17 20:55           ` Glenn Morris
2007-02-18 21:32             ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-19  8:26               ` Glenn Morris
2007-02-19 21:54                 ` Glenn Morris
2007-02-19 22:17                 ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-19 18:06               ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-19 20:20                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-20 13:43                   ` Richard Stallman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wt2i5688.fsf@stupidchicken.com \
    --to=cyd@stupidchicken.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=rgm@gnu.org \
    --cc=rms@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).