From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.50; Undefined symbol: _res_9_init Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 15:45:42 +0900 Message-ID: <87wsth9d9l.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <786A49C2-4433-47BA-97F3-1C35A0C3ADEF@Freenet.DE> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1192952712 23732 80.91.229.12 (21 Oct 2007 07:45:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 07:45:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org To: Peter Dyballa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 21 09:45:10 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IjVUk-0006x5-08 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 09:45:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IjVUc-0004Eg-3I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 03:45:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IjVRk-0001yt-Is for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 03:42:04 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IjVRh-0001vo-4m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 03:42:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IjVRg-0001un-BP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 03:42:00 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IjVRe-0006fL-SR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 03:41:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IjUYn-00059C-5F for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 02:45:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IjUYj-00039O-EE for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 02:45:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IjUYj-00039F-2v for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 02:45:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mtps02.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IjUYi-00085J-7d for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 02:45:12 -0400 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (unknown [130.158.99.156]) by mtps02.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 622058001; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 15:44:58 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 16CF61A2E12; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 15:45:43 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <786A49C2-4433-47BA-97F3-1C35A0C3ADEF@Freenet.DE> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" (+CVS-20070621) XEmacs Lucid X-detected-kernel: by mx20.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:81355 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:20181 Archived-At: Peter Dyballa writes: > so it's obviously a mistake to re-define res_init as res_9_init. This > re-definition happens in resolv.h in: Be careful. There's some tricky stuff in Mac OS X having to do with this. It was a galaxy long long ago and far far away, so I forget details and even the problem project, but probably what's happening is that you really want to pull in a BIND-specific library because libc doesn't have it but that library does. IIRC, of course. YMMV.