From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "simplifications" Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 10:34:47 +0900 Message-ID: <87wssb5ah4.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <86ejem1pig.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <8763zv7018.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <858x4rgtbx.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1195695185 27980 80.91.229.12 (22 Nov 2007 01:33:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 01:33:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, Stefan Monnier , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 22 02:33:09 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Iv0wH-0000wW-DH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 02:33:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iv0w3-0000JI-43 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:32:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Iv0vy-0000HG-PI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:32:50 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Iv0vs-0000BL-2a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:32:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iv0vr-0000Az-Tk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:32:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.223]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Iv0ve-0002wP-9K; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:32:30 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (unknown [130.158.99.156]) by mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0971B1535A8; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 10:32:28 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E2E411A2E12; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 10:34:47 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <858x4rgtbx.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" (+CVS-20070621) XEmacs Lucid X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:83818 Archived-At: David Kastrup writes: > "Stephen J. Turnbull" writes: > > > Stefan Monnier writes: > > > > > Some optimization with which I played locally. I still have it in my > > > tree, but all I got from it is an understanding that it's not the right > > > way to approach the problem :-) > > > > What, not even a "stupid T-shirt"? > > Without so much as a binding, it essentially becomes a single thread. *splutter* David, you owe me *three* monitor wipes ...