From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Enabling Transient Mark Mode by default Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 01:20:31 +0000 Message-ID: <87wsowo4dc.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87myq4saw1.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <20080219190127.GA1106@muc.de> <877ih0o9dx.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <85ablvftqe.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <8e24944a0802201130y1601cd6dvf22a8089e2de97f7@mail.gmail.com> <858x1fe6fc.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <8e24944a0802201241o4a2a70d0xb823b3fa27692bfd@mail.gmail.com> <87zltujk8n.fsf@jurta.org> <874pc0leip.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203726059 30012 80.91.229.12 (23 Feb 2008 00:20:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:20:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, wilde@sha-bang.de, david.delaharpe.golden@gmail.com, lennart.borgman@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, juri@jurta.org, dann@ics.uci.edu, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, storm@cua.dk, acm@muc.de To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 23 01:21:22 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JSi8i-0005im-Bg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 01:21:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JSi8C-0004Qi-MS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:20:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JSi88-0004QB-Np for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:20:40 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JSi88-0004Pr-0W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:20:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JSi87-0004Po-QF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:20:39 -0500 Original-Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.159]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JSi87-0007Z5-CS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:20:39 -0500 Original-Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so2843853fga.30 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:20:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; bh=Wv5Tx830EXr2Bser8zWOuncQ5wwOv9HN6KtEj82buqs=; b=qnljCn5cdCpMaKN/EpBMTUwRgRbxwQhes4hVtaQp+7hrtxzs/VJSUbWSz06oX5MR0i1BA85agAt4XExJnMKhxUllny9Vz1cFuJExaQxYn+rZBbhSCM8tQh7V4IL70wqjI63+zqWz2mqpHUtlJS7YTfNH/GsWgAglCQqrbrem1hI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; b=pgeW7zSZoDe9+OffegqMVtf8I9H6fTDG4hmzBTSl/ynuvrUYnoVQH7Beqi3fYiBZ9X8OUZCa0rTfjBXtv+tMfRm5lBHIEM/plMnS2jHBpwG1SQTgFjvnYTpTQG2/CRJD1sPgu8AxNLW/MLOEg8sYzhwzepRxYzCvvBsg3VdFoKM= Original-Received: by 10.86.74.15 with SMTP id w15mr619591fga.37.1203726038531; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:20:38 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from bzg.ath.cx ( [90.35.241.91]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e20sm2478366fga.1.2008.02.22.16.20.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:20:37 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by bzg.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B89C91575BD; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 01:20:31 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: <874pc0leip.fsf@catnip.gol.com> (Miles Bader's message of "Sat, 23 Feb 2008 09:09:34 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:90070 Archived-At: Miles Bader writes: > Now that I think about it, I really like this idea: it's very easy to > understand that C-SPC C-SPC and C-SPC are "active and non-active" > mark-setting commands, and simply swap roles depending on whether > full-t-m-mode is enabled, and obviously C-SPC C-SPC is very convenient > to type. +1 > I've never really used the "push a mark" command much, as I use > t-m-mode, but I think if C-SPC C-SPC pushed a non-active mark, I would > use it more often. I've never really used t-m-mode, as I often push marks, but I think if C-SPC C-SPC pushed a non-active mark, I would use it more often. :) -- Bastien