From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daiki Ueno Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: EasyPG API and usage questions Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:31:17 +0900 Message-ID: <87wsojngp6.fsf@broken.deisui.org> References: <87d4qiaj3j.fsf@broken.deisui.org> <87skzdi3pw.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <871w6w1k38.fsf@broken.deisui.org> <8663w7hg1o.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <54a15d860802291623m3c9844d1k80515e661f435179@mail.gmail.com> <86bq5vd0gk.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204612295 3816 80.91.229.12 (4 Mar 2008 06:31:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 06:31:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 04 07:32:01 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JWQgy-0004oX-RV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 07:32:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JWQgR-00041o-PZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 01:31:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JWQgM-00040n-P4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 01:31:22 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JWQgL-00040O-EY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 01:31:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JWQgL-00040L-5S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 01:31:21 -0500 Original-Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.181]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JWQgK-0001vU-SH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 01:31:21 -0500 Original-Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so647625wah.10 for ; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 22:31:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:sender; bh=9gLlJW9GnhzWEDLG6jA7/eMbZ1Cdw4sgxPOOJYe6T8w=; b=MyH8Rtr2ezwXN9LxYD1eXNPiCcKXyp5bzm0B2ehXXR6Z1Cv3uCGbELmnKRYSSMQ0Qfl0Tn0cLPXljJX1HhHg+qjA8ruJF3IPaRzJwk56SDIwtDDGMBSx7PN36XbSVp8mBDgi2MXvi0mvCgmDzDG6dgGi+dil9luAAf11za7/sdg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:sender; b=pY/ZtPDA9jgD1Pzc5M9A3qe9NlCV7GCQXw/AYEptOHwAsEgJK7eGM9SCMSf7sXY8EQgK4q6yghhl+7D9WAN9JnCc9fglQgzH3OFyNC8LDpkC/uSq7d+m+xouExkUD+/gL4Q5Zb6ZLA+t8pP/nhc4Rip127IoI6NPkahxkNdhl/w= Original-Received: by 10.114.121.1 with SMTP id t1mr1480113wac.67.1204612279879; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 22:31:19 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from p360 ( [150.82.173.253]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v38sm1771898wah.7.2008.03.03.22.31.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 03 Mar 2008 22:31:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <86bq5vd0gk.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Mon, 03 Mar 2008 14:19:55 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:91271 Archived-At: >>>>> In <86bq5vd0gk.fsf@lifelogs.com> >>>>> Ted Zlatanov wrote: DU> What feature do you want in addition to this? > Just the choice of cipher, and a way to limit the epa-file-enable effect > to the insert only (pending discussion above). I think that it would not be too late to implement these features until someone else really wants them. The former is not even provided by GPGME, GPA, etc., and I doubt the usefulness of the latter since other file-name-handlers (jka-compr-handler and image-file-handler) don't support it. Do you have reasonable criteria to make an exception in favor of epa-file-handler? > I think specifying symmetric encryption at the epa-file level would be > nice too. No, epa-file already supports this. You have never used epa-file, have you? It interactively asks you which encryption to use. DU> If all the custom-options should be documented in texi, I will do it. > If epa-file.el is a base Emacs feature, it should be documented so a > beginner can get started with it. Ok, I'll do. Regards, -- Daiki Ueno