From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: annoying behavior of emacs --daemon Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 11:48:06 -0500 Message-ID: <87wsfjfneh.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> References: <200811040634.mA46YGHE015780@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <200811040855.mA48tmJb020747@mothra.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1225817332 18455 80.91.229.12 (4 Nov 2008 16:48:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 16:48:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Dan Nicolaescu , Liang Wang , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 04 17:49:51 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-forward1.uio.no ([129.240.10.70]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KxP5e-0007Ks-It for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:49:14 +0100 Original-Received: from exim by mail-out1.uio.no with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KxP4Y-0001zN-0E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:48:06 +0100 Original-Received: from mail-mx2.uio.no ([129.240.10.30]) by mail-out1.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KxP4X-0001zK-VK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:48:05 +0100 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by mail-mx2.uio.no with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KxP4X-0007S3-BO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:48:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47902 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KxP4W-00044W-DW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 11:48:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KxP4S-000434-63 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 11:48:00 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KxP4Q-00042o-VK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 11:47:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47251 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KxP4Q-00042j-RA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 11:47:58 -0500 Original-Received: from cyd.mit.edu ([18.115.2.24]:34621) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KxP4P-0005me-S6; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 11:47:57 -0500 Original-Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9E48A57E08F; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:48:06 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Miles Bader's message of "Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:49:18 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-UiO-SPF-Received: Received-SPF: pass (mail-mx2.uio.no: domain of gnu.org designates 199.232.76.165 as permitted sender) client-ip=199.232.76.165; envelope-from=emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.8, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, MISSING_SUBJECT=0.001,NO_RECEIVED=-0.001,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG=0.156, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO) X-UiO-Scanned: 26E9F0CAEE01FF4915CCD551EF02464A2D987106 X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 199.232.76.165 spam_score: -37 maxlevel 200 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 27 total 76006 max/h 424 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:105339 Archived-At: Miles Bader writes: > "Liang Wang" writes: >>> Hmm, it seems to segfault in xlib, though I'm not sure why. I'm using >>> a gtk emacs; are you also? >> >> I got same problem. And I found a patch at >> http://www.nabble.com/segfault-when-using-XIM-with-multi-tty-on-gnu-linux-td18966793.html. >> It works for me. > > Ah, that patch fixes the problem for me too! Thank you! > > [I've attached a version of the patch which applies correctly > (nabble mucks up the whitespace).] I've applied the patch. Thanks.