From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Uwe Siart Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Incorrect documentation for hi-lock-mode? Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:02 +0100 Organization: Technische =?iso-8859-1?Q?Universit=E4t_M=FCnchen?= Message-ID: <87ws00jrgd.fsf@siart.de> References: <7b501d5c0912311118w64463e38xfef269fbb463a1bc@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262521691 20961 80.91.229.12 (3 Jan 2010 12:28:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 12:28:11 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 03 13:28:03 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NRPYw-0003Hj-9q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 13:28:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39082 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NRPYw-0003d0-Lt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 07:28:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NRPWF-0002nH-Jl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 07:25:15 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NRPWA-0002i5-Cf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 07:25:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53644 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NRPWA-0002hi-05 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 07:25:10 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:50593) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NRPW9-0004l4-Kp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 07:25:09 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NRPW5-0002Vs-Bf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 13:25:05 +0100 Original-Received: from p4fefeee0.dip.t-dialin.net ([79.239.238.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 13:25:05 +0100 Original-Received: from usenet by p4fefeee0.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 13:25:05 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p4fefeee0.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:IVWdKQYaet6+klscCQdzXNEr/Z4= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119303 Archived-At: Deniz Dogan writes: > It seems that this is incorrect. "C-x w" is undefined in the latest > Emacs. The documentation for the function `hi-lock-mode' says that the > bindings are the old familiar "M-s h r" etc. Is the documentation > above old and incorrect or am I missing something? Here "C-x w h" is defined only when 'hi-lock-mode' is active while "M-s h r" is always available (Emacs 23.1 on Win32). -- Uwe