From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Giorgos Keramidas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: utmp.h obsoleted in FreeBSD 9.0 Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:37:12 +0200 Message-ID: <87wrz7wzzb.fsf@kobe.laptop> References: <87ljfvqick.fsf@kobe.laptop> <874omctwla.fsf@kobe.laptop> <87r5pgpiws.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1264329743 11205 80.91.229.12 (24 Jan 2010 10:42:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 10:42:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 24 11:42:15 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NYzv5-0007sk-7G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:42:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32965 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NYzv6-0000XZ-EV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 05:42:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NYzqO-0007Vk-Jd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 05:37:24 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NYzqJ-0007RP-2q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 05:37:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33338 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NYzqI-0007RF-9L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 05:37:18 -0500 Original-Received: from poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr ([150.140.141.169]:36433) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NYzqH-0008UO-SL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 05:37:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.ceid.upatras.gr (unknown [10.1.0.143]) by poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85C5AEB4769; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:37:15 +0200 (EET) Original-Received: from localhost (europa.ceid.upatras.gr [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AFC7160C86; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:37:15 +0200 (EET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ceid.upatras.gr Original-Received: from mail.ceid.upatras.gr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (europa.ceid.upatras.gr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s+UljFPT3HsV; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:37:15 +0200 (EET) Original-Received: from kobe.laptop (ppp-94-64-229-17.home.otenet.gr [94.64.229.17]) by mail.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F939160C7C; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:37:15 +0200 (EET) Original-Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0OAbE9X003619 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:37:14 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Original-Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o0OAbCwv003615; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:37:12 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) In-Reply-To: <87r5pgpiws.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:15:31 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (berkeley-unix) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:120320 Archived-At: On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:15:31 -0500, Chong Yidong wrote: > Giorgos Keramidas writes: > >> After running a patched Emacs build or a couple of days, I've submitted >> the patch below to the editors/emacs and editors/emacs-devel packages of >> FreeBSD. Since it's a good idea to keep the "local patches" as small >> and few as possible, does anyone from the list feel like pushing this to >> the bzr branch for the next pretest too? > > Done, thanks. Fantastic, thank you :)