From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Flipping url-show-status default Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 18:29:36 -0400 Message-ID: <87wrq1czsf.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87fwwpkchk.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <877hi1eexk.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285972193 24728 80.91.229.12 (1 Oct 2010 22:29:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 22:29:53 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 02 00:29:52 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P1o6x-0006iy-5n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 00:29:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42248 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P1o6w-000672-Ct for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 18:29:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47437 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P1o6r-00066r-Bw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 18:29:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P1o6j-0000BO-7l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 18:29:45 -0400 Original-Received: from pantheon-po42.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.101]:43282) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P1o6j-0000BC-5z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 18:29:37 -0400 Original-Received: from furry (dhcp128036014154.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.154]) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po42.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o91MTa45021137 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 18:29:37 -0400 Original-Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E1237C018; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 18:29:36 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 02 Oct 2010 00:20:10 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:131198 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Chong Yidong writes: > >> This would involve specifying a callback function for each intermediate >> step; callers would have to specify their own callback function, but >> pretty much every caller would want to do the same thing, i.e. report >> how much of the operation is done). > > The caller could send in a `silent' flag, which would be useful > especially for async operation. Yes, that would be fine. (I guess this would work by binding url-show-status to nil locally in the url buffer).