From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Redirecting standard output Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 10:27:53 +0200 Message-ID: <87wriouhyu.fsf@gmx.de> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1303374492 11706 80.91.229.12 (21 Apr 2011 08:28:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 08:28:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 21 10:28:08 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QCpF9-0005wS-U5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 10:28:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49206 helo=lists2.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QCpF6-0006Fy-C2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 04:28:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51756) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QCpF3-0006Ft-TC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 04:28:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QCpF2-0003Jp-JW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 04:28:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:43933) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QCpF2-0003JN-7t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 04:28:00 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2011 08:27:56 -0000 Original-Received: from p57BB9278.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO detlef.gmx.de) [87.187.146.120] by mail.gmx.net (mp054) with SMTP; 21 Apr 2011 10:27:56 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3708877 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1//zlIa28z/SpyJeb0ToDBCwbFPxwq+E6rjXKtOLw HVRPGGOtCo86tg In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 20 Apr 2011 19:54:40 -0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 213.165.64.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138603 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> I'm not sure what the syntax would be, though, since a string parameter >> to REAL-BUFFER already means "use the buffer with this name".... >> eurmh... well, off the top of my head, we could use keywords for the >> complex case. That is BUFFER could be, er, something like > >> (:stdout (:file "/tmp/foo") :stderr (:buffer "bar")) > >> Backwards compatibility would be easy to maintain. > > Sounds fine to me, as long as the patch is simple enough, This would also require changes in Tramp, for process-file (and start-file-process, if start-process is changed as well). Not a big deal, just to mention it ... > Stefan Best regards, Michael.