From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Replacing tarballs on-the-fly Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 16:31:34 -0400 Message-ID: <87wreume3d.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87tya82mv5.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87ei1bzjwg.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <4E3133CE.7010101@cs.ucla.edu> <4E31F0B3.3030505@cs.ucla.edu> <87mxfw90oo.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87r558ms8j.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87zkjv33w3.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87tya2e60e.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87oc09ygjc.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <20023.6773.683359.419770@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <87ipqf7q3a.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <20024.14117.671570.597808@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312403513 27895 80.91.229.12 (3 Aug 2011 20:31:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 20:31:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ulrich Mueller , dak@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 03 22:31:49 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qoi6U-0005xo-W3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 22:31:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38135 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qoi6T-0006em-VJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 16:31:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53408) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qoi6R-0006eV-6f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 16:31:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qoi6Q-0001ox-2T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 16:31:43 -0400 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-03.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.144]:57733) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qoi6N-0001iG-N1; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 16:31:39 -0400 Original-Received: from furball ([128.36.14.213]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-03.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p73KVYHI029527 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 3 Aug 2011 16:31:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:17:00 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.144 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.132.50.144 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:142846 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > Another minor point: There's still an emacs-23.1-23.2.xdelta with > a date from 2010. Probably that file should be deleted too? > > Yes, it should be. Deleted. I didn't bother generating a new xdelta; the fact that no one has ever complained about a lack of 23.2-23.3 xdelta indicates that nobody is using it.