From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs,gmane.emacs.windows,gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: bug#10612: GnuTLS bundled with the windows Emacs binaries (was:
	bug#10215: 24.0.92; Can't contact nnimap (gnutls-cli not found))
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:44:03 -0600
Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80_?=
	=?UTF-8?Q?=D0=97=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= @
	Cienfuegos
Message-ID: <87wr8e8o58.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com>
References: <84boromyob.fsf@tum.de> <m3lipk5scv.fsf@stories.gnus.org>
	<84ipknew07.fsf@tum.de> <87ipjzs512.fsf@gnus.org>
Reply-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327589218 8654 80.91.229.12 (26 Jan 2012 14:46:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:46:58 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: help-emacs-windows@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: 10612@debbugs.gnu.org
Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 26 15:46:53 2012
Return-path: <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1RqQbC-0003EJ-2A
	for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:46:50 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41036 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1RqQbB-0005y6-2P
	for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:46:49 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42990)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1RqQaw-0005Bl-Br
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:46:39 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1RqQas-00052q-9O
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:46:34 -0500
Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39746)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1RqQas-00052g-62
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:46:30 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1RqQbN-0002Rg-SP
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:47:01 -0500
X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org
Resent-From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>
Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:47:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.10612.B.13275891689326@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org
X-GNU-PR-Message: report 10612
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.13275891689326
	(code B ref -1); Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:47:01 +0000
Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2012 14:46:08 +0000
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45133 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1RqQaV-0002QN-R7
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:46:08 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46919)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org>) id 1RqQaP-0002Pp-Hy
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:46:06 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org>) id 1RqQZX-0004pz-Lf
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:45:23 -0500
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:56137)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org>) id 1RqQZX-0004pM-Hd
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:45:07 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42537)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org>) id 1RqQZQ-0004yB-W3
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:45:07 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org>) id 1RqQZK-0004i1-89
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:45:00 -0500
Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:50945)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org>) id 1RqQZK-0004hn-11
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:44:54 -0500
Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org>) id 1RqQZI-00021E-Hm
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:44:52 +0100
Original-Received: from 38.98.147.133 ([38.98.147.133])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:44:52 +0100
Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.133 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:44:52 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
Mail-Followup-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Original-Lines: 22
Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.133
X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;
	d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT=
	D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx"
Mail-Copies-To: never
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nRxiRsxJQ4I4rpvCyW7W0bWuIOo=
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2)
X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43
X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
	the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56034 gmane.emacs.windows:5226 gmane.emacs.devel:147943
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs/56034>

On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:04:25 +0100 Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote: 

LI> Uwe Siart <uwe.siart@tum.de> writes:
>> Thanks a lot for pointing me to that and sorry for my stupidness. I
>> wasn't aware that additional software is necessary because it hasn't
>> been necessary for Emacs 23.3 (precompiled for Windows). More even I
>> wasn't aware that GnuTLS is available for Windows.

LI> Hopefully Emacs 24 will be distributed (for Windows) with the GnuTLS
LI> libraries included, so that this will just work out of the box.
LI> Otherwise I think there will be many similar bug reports.  :-)

Christoph has been doing that, I think, so we can rely on his binaries.

Christoph, can you add a GnuTLS build step to your Emacs build for
Windows, so the latest GnuTLS version can be used on that platform?  We
had a long conversation about this and at least for now it seems to be
the best approach (and we agreed it would not be a task for the core
Emacs developers).  If you prefer, I can set up a BuildBot to produce
the GnuTLS DLLs for you.

Ted