From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Engster Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CEDET version Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 20:13:26 +0100 Message-ID: <87wqv62vu1.fsf@engster.org> References: <87txqgjfmx.fsf@mail36.net> <9c38xzv0q7.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <76ehhjw8bb.fsf_-_@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1358795628 16853 80.91.229.3 (21 Jan 2013 19:13:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 19:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Eric M. Ludlam" , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 21 20:14:06 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TxMok-00022J-Hl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 20:14:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35810 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TxMoT-0004Cp-5G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 14:13:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42728) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TxMoQ-0004CZ-58 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 14:13:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TxMoO-0001KL-SC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 14:13:42 -0500 Original-Received: from randomsample.de ([83.169.19.17]:53378) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TxMoO-0001DC-Fs; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 14:13:40 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=randomsample.de; s=a; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=jWr6f85OLWG2MtHGIAoDLDrRC1cRgPHXhaLJcPmTPgs=; b=cfcnNf9In1twDmNUhUn9a5c4P5+gkBhmWMM9lNpRciPXETuDFh5dIdebWVU2lymDrB2Oky8IRByw7JRwsMlJKve0/B019CkHumKD6UR1jBucR/fq+a+bnwgUbKjxx2qe; Original-Received: from dslc-082-083-044-094.pools.arcor-ip.net ([82.83.44.94] helo=spaten) by randomsample.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TxMoF-0006mI-At; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 20:13:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Sun, 20 Jan 2013 21:20:18 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) Mail-Followup-To: Glenn Morris , emacs-devel@gnu.org, "Eric M. Ludlam" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 83.169.19.17 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:156556 Archived-At: Glenn Morris writes: > Glenn Morris wrote: > >>> emacs-24.2.92 -Q -l cedet >>> C-h v cedet-version >>> -> "1.1" >> >> Yet the Version: header says 1.0pre7. > > Hi, could you clarify what the CEDET version is in the emacs-24 branch > and if any of the Version: headers need updating? Actually, it's more like a 1.2 since 1.1 was already released some time ago, and the now bundled files are newer. It is a bit difficult since we bundle a subset of CEDET with Emacs, so upstream versions cannot be really identical. Since we're now merging more regularly, maybe we don't need upstream releases anymore and should see it more as in incubator. In any case, I think calling this version "1.1.5" or "1.2" should be fine, but I'd like to know what Eric thinks. -David