From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Git transition checklist Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 16:02:19 +0100 Message-ID: <87wqiams90.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> References: <20140108135200.8ECF9380834@snark.thyrsus.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1389193392 20166 80.91.229.3 (8 Jan 2014 15:03:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 15:03:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: esr@thyrsus.com (Eric S. Raymond) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 08 16:03:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W0uf8-00059U-1Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 16:03:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47170 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0uf7-0002Tt-Ky for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 10:03:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35413) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0ueK-0001Sj-Ae for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 10:02:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0ueF-0007ev-Ca for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 10:02:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:63981) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0ueF-0007ef-4T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 10:02:23 -0500 Original-Received: from rosalinde.fritz.box ([89.245.79.99]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LzoSt-1VNe3S1Nlz-0152UK for ; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 16:02:21 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20140108135200.8ECF9380834@snark.thyrsus.com> (Eric S. Raymond's message of "Wed, 8 Jan 2014 08:52:00 -0500 (EST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:884ERmcfiZoSynThWhod42smnhCBLPIQx8Y5EGcBZkNSdhdPhxw Ub9aSN0UVxaUuxYWsXCLj3TJkBhtYqHE1BG121aThvaPfIYSGJLYc+BljUWwRH3pWyLwVfk RkngSUjAgR4ZTkOwcZGGvS/GBMqZ8R8NX9yApzHKIUJT2766FKmhJsxFrsbCzmLcKDQ02+k XhnPXctwgCRUd+NY8hFSw== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:167732 Archived-At: On Wed, 8 Jan 2014 08:52:00 -0500 (EST) esr@thyrsus.com (Eric S. Raymond) wrote: > This post rounds up all the issues I know about with the bzr to git > changeover and their current state. [...] > Nobody else explicitly suggested any additional preconditions. I suggested one (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2014-01/msg00594.html): On Tue, 07 Jan 2014 15:57:05 +0100 Andreas Schwab wrote: > Stephen Berman writes: > >> Why is the git repository so much larger than the bzr repository? > > The git repositories on savannah appear to be packed rather badly. A > reasonably well packed emacs repository should have around 350MB. Ok. If the packing can be improved, I think it would be good for that to happen before finalizing the move to git. Steve Berman