From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: why do some programming modes have customize hooks and others do not? Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 13:37:53 +0200 Message-ID: <87wq7xtxpq.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87bnp9eir3.fsf@ferrier.me.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1413632301 8770 80.91.229.3 (18 Oct 2014 11:38:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 11:38:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Nic Ferrier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 18 13:38:12 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XfSKp-0001cZ-D3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 13:38:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36284 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XfSKp-0001oX-1g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 07:38:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45288) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XfSKh-0001oN-7H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 07:38:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XfSKb-0004Mk-7G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 07:38:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::22d]:45777) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XfSKb-0004MW-0w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 07:37:57 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id m15so2438967wgh.28 for ; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 04:37:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=m5KlpVVtU5bsevNET+ZFvyg5rzsZIvSO+3KTggAmC/Y=; b=WoPuR2NGe5aBL2KTLyx/9y7BZHdX8xqUEXtUO8mahQqjIJVi+K3K6UqqvHLlA2yCmn dVD4GiSO2kcHjyK64D502jdUPl/zLXkwYGmQR5pRX0uDWLOoi9D/sc9JVCYIEHl/U/vr UcxcE+tT8XNaFAfEYvZj6De/KVo/J+xjnNvcRk5T7TEKsTKASpOHqfg12XYaqPz3MLOS rT+k2fUesE0ua+m9zv5n+8ozWzhFGPeqk+l4PH6zaZ9KRbHIlK2mRWglrVwNS/8dh4e5 WHN3mEFlana3fnz8ht03nHPXKVw1IK3lSnpzrKh+nP6JyIxo8HnyR+Wi6uY5q6eetcic QD8Q== X-Received: by 10.194.110.10 with SMTP id hw10mr17743725wjb.102.1413632276003; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 04:37:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from bzg.localdomain (195-132-9-224.rev.numericable.fr. [195.132.9.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ws2sm4936920wjc.32.2014.10.18.04.37.54 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 18 Oct 2014 04:37:55 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by bzg.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DA5A21C22C1F; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 13:37:53 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87bnp9eir3.fsf@ferrier.me.uk> (Nic Ferrier's message of "Sat, 18 Oct 2014 12:10:08 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22d X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:175534 Archived-At: Hi Nic, Nic Ferrier writes: > Is there any reasoning to this discrepancy or is it just the personal > preference of the author of the mode? I suggest you send a patch or a bug report: you will get either the reason why this is the way it is or a solution to your problem. (Discrepancies are rarely the result of some reasoning.) 2 cts, -- Bastien