From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Romain Francoise Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Network security manager Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:57:54 +0100 Organization: orebokech dot com Message-ID: <87wq6tu5m5.fsf@kima.orebokech.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416244072 23978 80.91.229.3 (17 Nov 2014 17:07:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:07:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 17 18:07:45 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XqPm9-0003Q9-5g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 18:07:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49090 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqPm8-0001No-MW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 12:07:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35191) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqPcx-0002Xj-0w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:58:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqPcp-0002GK-3B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:58:10 -0500 Original-Received: from stringer.orebokech.com ([212.83.175.182]:38416) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqPco-0002BV-UW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:58:03 -0500 Original-Received: from kima.orebokech.com (kima [192.168.2.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by stringer.orebokech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ACC714089E; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:57:54 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by kima.orebokech.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1E8742400EE; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:57:54 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 17 Nov 2014 08:59:51 -0500") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 212.83.175.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177451 Archived-At: On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 08:59:51AM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote: > I suggest you do it on a personal branch until the point where it > becomes testable, at which point you can move it to trunk (aka > "master"). And should personal branches be hosted in the official repository? If so, shouldn't we agree on a namespace (e.g. `feature/larsi/secmanager')? Or should developers create separate forked repositories for their personal branches, ala Github/Gitorious?