From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Uwe Brauer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Removing rollback from VC mode - request for comment Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 21:54:32 +0100 Message-ID: <87wq5wa8s7.fsf@mat.ucm.es> References: <20141211092138.6D5F6C008E@snark.thyrsus.com> <87y4qcj2mq.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87mw6sdetf.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87tx10iya1.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87iohgdarf.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1418417732 19432 80.91.229.3 (12 Dec 2014 20:55:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 20:55:32 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 12 21:55:25 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XzXFB-0001cr-Sg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 21:55:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59464 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzXFB-0006gH-I8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:55:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53796) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzXF1-0006fZ-Pq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:55:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzXEv-00067u-6H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:55:11 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:35027) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzXEv-000672-0a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:55:05 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XzXEt-00015q-OS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 21:55:03 +0100 Original-Received: from 171.pool85-55-19.dynamic.orange.es ([85.55.19.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 21:55:03 +0100 Original-Received: from oub by 171.pool85-55-19.dynamic.orange.es with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 21:55:03 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 16 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 171.pool85-55-19.dynamic.orange.es Mail-Copies-To: never X-Hashcash: 1:20:141212:gmane.emacs.devel::hLbpzP9YeQvldjlD:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000036tj User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) XEmacs/21.5-b33 (linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:se6FuK5iSZ4B61YXDHX5jmxJeXU= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:179963 Archived-At: >> "Stefan" == Stefan Monnier writes: >> Well, it was the inspiration for preview-latex's "never touch the buffer >> text" philosophy. It would be interesting to redo X-Symbol with text >> overlays rather than actual text replacements, but it could trigger >> performance problems. > Which part of X-Symbol is still useful? I'd say the idea to have code, which does not even rely on correct latex syntax, nor on a working Latex installation, to have semi-WYSIWYG for buffers containing math formula. > Stefan