From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Engster Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [Buildbot] Gnus build failed Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 12:44:17 +0200 Message-ID: <87wpzpni0u.fsf@isaac.fritz.box> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1433069085 24467 80.91.229.3 (31 May 2015 10:44:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 10:44:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Katsumi Yamaoka Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 31 12:44:36 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yz0jL-0001fh-Fe for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 31 May 2015 12:44:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41701 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yz0jK-0008IV-TY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 31 May 2015 06:44:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36524) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yz0jI-0008IQ-09 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 May 2015 06:44:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yz0jE-0005ij-Hx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 May 2015 06:44:31 -0400 Original-Received: from randomsample.de ([5.45.97.173]:58287) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yz0jE-0005fT-94 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 May 2015 06:44:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=randomsample.de; s=a; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=r/LKeA0i7hMxXTleX7rnMIQscVljsxQy4oHqkpXwMNk=; b=ewDHmxa+LUqYxKnlhHBf+YB+brpOckzu7aAOzPs5/LU3kKxmyQagPQxcWS/qIa6l9GQfVcJIoj+xwgxaQRePFrpK+VXXVChCURiMquByPO4VrdhUEGYHvm1H+I1jNSzI; Original-Received: from ip4d152b77.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([77.21.43.119] helo=isaac.fritz.box) by randomsample.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yz0j6-0007fE-U8; Sun, 31 May 2015 12:44:21 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Katsumi Yamaoka's message of "Fri, 29 May 2015 09:13:58 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 5.45.97.173 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:186964 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:85993 Archived-At: Katsumi Yamaoka writes: > On Fri, 29 May 2015 01:57:05 +0200, gnus-buildbot@randomsample.de wrote: >> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder emacs-devel. >> Details at: http://randomsample.de/gnus-buildbot/builders/emacs-devel/builds/737 >> Blamelist: Katsumi Yamaoka > > >> Please note: >> - The Buildbot uses 'make fail-on-warn' >> - If this build fails again, it will only be reported on the >> Gnus-buildbot mailing list (gmane.emacs.gnus.buildbot) > >> --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Why did the build, in the last process `test', fail? > The change are for only string objects (see below), so it should > not be a cause of any error. Two reasons, and both indeed have nothing to do with the actual commit: - Using `sleep-for' to wait for the ping to Gmane does not seem to wait. This seems to be this issue here: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=15990 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2013-02/msg00294.html I replaced that `sleep-for' with a call to the 'sleep' binary... - Connecting to Gmane seems to be unreliable, so I disabled running the test for now. -David