Re: Minor typo in seq-let info docs

[Nicolas Petton <nicolas@petton.fr>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1124 bytes --]

raman@google.com writes:

> This sentence re seq-let is hard to parse -- suspect an extra "in":
>
> <cite>
> -- Macro: seq-let arguments sequence body…
>      This macro binds the variables in defined in the sequence ARGUMENTS
>      to the elements of the sequence SEQUENCE.  ARGUMENTS can itself
>      include sequences allowing for nested destructuring.
>
> -- 
>
> </cite> 
>
> In addition, the somewhat self-referential nature of the opening
> sentence makes it confusing reading. That I am listening to it likely
> makes it harder -- adding some quoting in addition to case changes
> would make it easier reading.
>
> <rewrite>
> -- Macro: seq-let arguments sequence body…
>      This macro binds the variables  listed in  `ARGUMENTS'
>      to the elements of the sequence SEQUENCE.  `ARGUMENTS' can itself
>      include sequences allowing for nested destructuring.
>
> -- 

Indeed, thanks for the rewrite!

I will apply your changes (without quoting ARGUMENTS though, function
arguments should not be quoted in docstrings).

Nico
-- 
Nicolas Petton
http://nicolas-petton.fr

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 512 bytes --]