From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs master, w32/w64 Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:44:24 +0100 Message-ID: <87wps64vav.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87poxz5vih.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1450781088 17104 80.91.229.3 (22 Dec 2015 10:44:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:44:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Fabrice Popineau Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 22 11:44:37 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aBKQn-0007ep-84 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:44:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49635 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aBKQm-0006aR-IR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 05:44:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39832) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aBKQi-0006Zy-RQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 05:44:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aBKQd-0006Bh-OF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 05:44:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:56432) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aBKQd-0006BY-FD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 05:44:27 -0500 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([87.146.61.208]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MVsUW-1ZeNFZ2Hwu-00X7oY; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:44:25 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Fabrice Popineau's message of "Mon, 21 Dec 2015 23:05:38 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:HdWPdaz8uVsUx4eN0OYcO/cN9N/4T7kPL+0IJtUGPBW56m6myRg newph2HARxX1YqzNez1VyKnHcu/s7+Ug7Xb9L6883iJDwXVQ3Odz0mdlSJ9dlO2oTi13Bfc SEEYG+MfONOgxCIvc084rIxobGyvKaZgyDq9NwAvMOqNBjdAuvHf4VnOrCkTjmZlSgOmiR5 9MOgJ4/6dWhDaQgYQXTkQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:s4XFe4R/Knk=:uvMIgm8NeufJ9TOWsIqE05 NpyDc9/M7wTm0FbINPmcULrDNFBNsT3XLl0yYVBuwF+nrhj3cz4xdeKHWeN4heR6SaFVjSiy4 D6cmVT+MloFMqbMdKsi2aH0hMLPN46r5HgzAaQaL24q4lm9AmJ2bUXNADJ8Dtj1nAwT0+BRGa mhP2w+uMVcsZ5gE/QZgdF9k23DQcuEOuWuHSK8//lLvRPHp8+0oJmxPkncneC3P7KwLxKWa6i jZqQmIF8IpzF0d++9NpvhE/uE2E0Tt4a9AZs4R+8i2EdII0hOe8jgv+E57W5h7gPlvkgQL7dv BwIWsXYoJMmtbIIH4t4iT5T8MmzAJsTtFbDW7XWotZa8LnaTXzlvrJMv1qqHxAJf0VXRc69I2 vkTj7PllfI7yIJCeydZF1Zbz0bsQGQmNjaQumgndBhDT5OCSe4FjGW5tdw2z1HYq+skCvb6hP opaJtCtHp/51fnSS6yeqUso2vc1QBFmmAqIggDd7oZafu4sCcDAxCJsCDIvzJQ3uVTFUOGSIt Z7vcN79T37XVuC2/+HYRtxrzIwFefFIPBC1kHEAMYi591/alSOsf8jxud0XTmmOJxNzhKLX2P J+TGelURI4CeA4PwCMjkf/pb2Yoo1+9g00lxHv7YY19plfLbj1y0veaHYKQrzQuzVoMqijFYl Vs3j7JZqLh0AlVGC99s57t57ZhVqtBzoPRH8IHYm5X2Pr5DLE+GM9UNcHg8pwM6cC3SMTn5ft rSYLJK4Uy1YZw3uoXWZSt8aHApqtW/cNor/1whw5/kg4il2hTonwvf0spt6Kg0OXtoa2tPJl X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.21 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:196660 Archived-At: Fabrice Popineau writes: > - both `file-notify-test02-events' and > `file-notify-test06-many-events' fail (with nil instead of the > expected value) This is a hint that both test cases did run into their timeouts. It might be also explain, why it takes so much time for you. > - I have the feeling that the read-event calls do not timeout in 0.1s > as expected. When I run file-notify-test02-events > in edebug mode, read-event does not return in less than 5-10s. I don't > know it is meaningful however. I have no idea how `read-event' behaves on Windows, sorry. > I'll try to investigate, but I'm not familiar at all with the way all > of this is working. > Fabrice Best regards, Michael.