From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Text property searching Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 19:35:23 +0200 Message-ID: <87wox7yrz8.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> References: <87lgdo5bb3.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87in8r16b0.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87d0yz15a3.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87604r143y.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1523900094 24682 195.159.176.226 (16 Apr 2018 17:34:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 17:34:54 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel To: =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 16 19:34:50 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f881h-0006KQ-0G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 19:34:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60581 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f883n-0001WR-Od for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:36:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57824) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f882b-0001UU-Oz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:35:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f882W-0007Lv-T9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:35:45 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:44328) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f882W-0007Kp-M8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:35:40 -0400 Original-Received: from 46.67.12.60.tmi.telenormobil.no ([46.67.12.60] helo=corrigan) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f882R-00070C-Vg; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 19:35:38 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by corrigan with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f882K-0007Ca-S0; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 19:35:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?Q?=22Jo=C3=A3o_T=C3=A1vora=22's?= message of "Mon, 16 Apr 2018 18:30:10 +0100") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:224654 Archived-At: Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora writes: > Perhaps we are misunderstanding each other. I asked you earlier > if the new function can grab regions of the buffer where a particular > property isn't present, which is different from that property being nil. I misunderstood. No, I wasn't aware that there was any difference between "not being present" and "being nil" for text properties. --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no