From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: new-flex-completion-style Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 01:16:02 +0100 Message-ID: <87wom5amkd.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <20190202232827.27331.87300@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20190202232828.4AE452159A@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87lg2mynrg.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="48711"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.90 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 12 01:30:33 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gtLy2-000CRZ-0x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 01:30:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58780 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtLy0-0007Uw-T4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 19:30:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35158) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtLuX-0003dY-OD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 19:26:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtLkF-00076D-PJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 19:16:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=33044 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtLk9-0006yN-W0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 19:16:11 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gtLk8-0015F1-6m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 01:16:08 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:xkmZWHGQOrhCRSYr4L2Fm+UzfsI= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:233244 Archived-At: João Távora writes: > I don't see the problem fully, but probably I'd rather remove the > annotation completely for now, until we have a better of how where we > want to place it. As Dmitry suggested, the flex score annotation is > mostly a gimmick, we shouldn't add it until we have a good idea of how > it should work. Do you know flx [1] ? Would it be possible to implement it on top of your work by providing a score function and/or a sort function? 1. https://github.com/lewang/flx