From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alex Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Renaming non-X x_* procedures in xdisp.c (and elsewhere) Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 09:07:04 -0600 Message-ID: <87wokp4okn.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="217310"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 23 16:08:07 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h7iFi-000uQO-HF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2019 16:08:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44501 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7iFh-0006JT-Fr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2019 11:08:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42300) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7iEw-0006IJ-B7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2019 11:07:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7iEs-0001lW-GE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2019 11:07:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-it1-x133.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::133]:55882) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7iEq-0001dZ-5k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2019 11:07:14 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-it1-x133.google.com with SMTP id z126so7761106itd.5 for ; Sat, 23 Mar 2019 08:07:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=s9gv69+ud0IZjr/gGPpkSzmgAN0K6jIhagDeIkB1hp8=; b=D8kdwhSOyAXVFHAcd6cHZr3fhHDQSiq0wT8HKWa8jaz8DmVrtX3xdc7K5syI2EGp01 zik7fyZsLBkQRkS8X1dD8occm8hjZTbmC6dthjYdp0H1LLC0oiyrn2pmEnc417qE5aoF AJOPoi5gPq8cWDqvVMYaZexrnFnmrSmM9QP+5bSzT2uHAO8iNiU/ndHYHDrymuUEzvdY of8fcE141SUjbSmFf0s9MtEZsZRLRHtvXxYv9xRUXcF6jGAE+ArydpaiO0sJnh8DqPjF XzV/660ck8a6gjgooEKqXByzq8mtgWDJoWC1hdDkZUrsJquZVbPKrmB6uFSABfnXB/M3 OzvQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :mime-version; bh=s9gv69+ud0IZjr/gGPpkSzmgAN0K6jIhagDeIkB1hp8=; b=lAMI7ogeDN7r24zVtbjIRQrEp0CrQs8FcgK8apzSbCbMg+1dw3JZblfrdYRjnRZoKB byyfNkLioYf6xgAJG2305ql+W3JKG1fM3LS7q5A6fMRd9+yQ7Vf+7ayko4JY5Wa0kEl6 OCLJs5aJ/mDXJnIXzdF97+Av7QfZESU55J2K1+djr4EUJ1z29ByoT6HZriD9WZ0xSEhH 51oyP82HUNK2v6QkzwllGGt9/KF3u4HnXFR9U6K1aenbIaQIXe8CGDRfyEB4pSknvm7k qt8ZgOr6XMC0f5D63bm33AMUXo1gtzZwiAII5E8wCoT3GpShf/pHfJ2+42L+yV/smdiW gSzA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVlNoD6GumGYwQlGEDV/K4Ac20BoTqIoX/7mL7UN3XiVCpCQ4Ha vaSGxlAAADKFhp9CMbUe0F6yVSpQ X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx+m8OzUWlFDEEBglqRZrEUZu5h3gd/CixQ/IHLk5pEeIUqv6GgxGHTVHMAS2rTO4fVQw77mQ== X-Received: by 2002:a24:5ec2:: with SMTP id h185mr6158216itb.19.1553353626898; Sat, 23 Mar 2019 08:07:06 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from lylat ([2604:3d09:e380:2255:962f:b96:2aaf:c3d5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o129sm3327849ito.0.2019.03.23.08.07.05 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 23 Mar 2019 08:07:06 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::133 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:234646 Archived-At: It would be helpful to determine at a glance whether or not a procedure is generic or depends on X support. I'm guessing that this naming scheme is a historical artifact from when graphical support meant X support, but I believe that it is more confusing than it is worth at this point. For example, x_write_glyphs could become disp_write_glyphs.