From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ai_flags in calls to getaddrinfo, broader call for reproducibility check Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:32:24 +0000 Message-ID: <87wnwjuv5j.fsf@tcd.ie> References: <83sg7mggls.fsf@gnu.org> <83czymc8nq.fsf@gnu.org> <74b7a0a9-0eb3-7944-19d2-f72424ee72d7@dasyatidae.com> <83eeirfqbo.fsf@gnu.org> <87o8hvscfi.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29037"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 11 20:52:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kz3EY-0007Qc-E6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 20:52:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42438 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kz3EX-0002A3-BH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:52:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53498) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kz2va-0000hU-Ju for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:32:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]:36380) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kz2vU-0002LH-Vb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:32:34 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id t16so981587wra.3 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:32:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tcd-ie.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version; bh=unzPIvLzKftop+19ziVFjz/8X9ABt2S/8OHP1NpgvRA=; b=KuFoDKREt2JblZ+f+KjC1EJkbYLh4Y/sQYGNH06mPT1iEMfWOyCiuroUVBuxxV63Gu TXKcCImTSHFw3u26MkC1ygT3ui5gBmjnKSNljT/Z4mNIKz01ohyWM1Vd4H79jABoJe/B uESMZFA8KH7LPxy21UoLoG+uFIGBDCPyp4U7SKflubdb4uPELJhk0CSs2COGB5u2bua9 sDGTlhyZABRaBC1ZbCN6t248fyHEP7ce+54M15GBo9mh/boUiQdTcfx981s/kDECkkjX yoMt626NhvYa7SToPVGHmLc6tPw+gmRpJWswMf3Q/TJnlAlZvFyTptGI8TfAei5cas9t UzPQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=unzPIvLzKftop+19ziVFjz/8X9ABt2S/8OHP1NpgvRA=; b=TweJbpR+SrcNBHVKdOB8g3ODnf+cT3BIiBHOlV9YyZon3ScwOlBidpurzRfu1LPg8i 2PzhZMruvcYox9GaEhuSLWgq0BsScGZCS0xU6fkhw061BtZBfVeORHDBRpOo7Gd/qeCU 6d8TUzft9L0wFKJewEJiMbBRR64IJUjSSo/kYsiWHtMJSnJpsJ6vimJymi80ZUrb60iv 3XlKsfOsHE1k7aK8330zUdSRKtF6uWuZe43+gAiKzKO9rX3BRhlRyu21hPoC+fz6uSdE H7lbQyrpV/pPyXHGs0TVdLMLlAxz+Cyi65HppQ3mFnEUsNgGWHT3tRUqqg5haCk27TcP slfA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530rq1guob0GEeHTQpm9EuJJh04PG621g9TbJQbHft71v12ApVBW +TW+tRqKGCAzylpTs7vx7OJoap2qq5gsAXHt X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwQYXtThyYwk5KwxO9wxtccEV96u++YOG70GBsKeqdDOA9tonduxvoESrxV6KHYyJod6BNXUg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:144f:: with SMTP id v15mr660658wrx.138.1610393546383; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:32:26 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost ([2a02:8084:20e2:c380:f410:82e8:3a21:eedf]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y130sm421674wmc.22.2021.01.11.11.32.25 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:32:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87o8hvscfi.fsf@gmail.com> (Robert Pluim's message of "Mon, 11 Jan 2021 16:47:29 +0100") Received-SPF: none client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42d; envelope-from=contovob@tcd.ie; helo=mail-wr1-x42d.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:262929 Archived-At: Robert Pluim writes: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> I'm asking because I'm still bothered by failures in those two tests, >> and would like to avoid that. I think it's bad if a test fails when >> there's nothing wrong with Emacs; we should try to skip such tests >> when we know their results cannot be trusted. > > The results can be trusted. However, the assumption of the tests is > that DNS lookups on AAAA records will work, and return results for > google.com, which is not the case for you. If you prefer we can change > the tests to check for "no error" rather than 'returns a result' (is > there an ERT 'should-not-error' clause)? Yes, progn (implicit or otherwise) ;). [ See the penultimate paragraph in (info "(ert) The should Macro"). ] This is definitely a long shot, but any chance bug#45798 relates to this? Thanks, -- Basil