From: Tim Cross <theophilusx@gmail.com>
To: "Brian Cully via Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
Cc: rms@gnu.org, "Ãscar Fuentes" <ofv@wanadoo.es>
Subject: Re: gmail+imap+smtp (oauth2)
Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 10:54:44 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wnezqxsy.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sfpnk66z.fsf@ditto.jhoto.spork.org>
Brian Cully via "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel@gnu.org> writes:
> Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Does it have to be _your_ phone number, or can it be any phone
>> that you can answer at the time of creating the app password?
>> Will Google ever phone you again on the same number?
>>
>> Another question is, does setting up the app password require
>> a computer running nonfree software? (For instance, a mobile phone.)
>> Can you do this with a landline?
>
> It does not have to be your phone number, no. They will send an SMS to whatever
> number you choose (so long as its not on a blacklist somewhere). You do not need
> to run non-free software, presuming you can receive SMS with non-free software
> (there are services for such things).
>
> However, you have the choice of using TOTP for 2FA[1], in which case you can use
> any number of free applications to generate codes for you. If you use SMS as
> your 2FA, Google will send messages to you periodically as you attempt to log in
> to services (though only with your main password - not app passwords). Once
> converted to TOTP, though, I do not believe Google will ever try to contact you
> again. I have set up Google accounts using burner numbers and converted them to
> TOTP without any issue over the years. However, there’s obviously no guarantee
> that Google will continue to allow this in the future.
>
> -bjc
>
> [1] There may be restrictions I’m not aware of when using TOTP, as I’d set mine
> up a long time ago. You may, for instance, need to be able to receive SMS in
> order to do the initial TOTP setup. You definitely need to use SMS to do initial
> account setup.
The SMS workflow is not Google's preferred 2FA. When Google first rolled
out 2FA, SMS based codes were widely used and it was one of the
techniques recommended by NIST. However, due to issues with number
spoofing and social engineering of Telco service desks to redirect
numbers etc, NIST now recommends against SMS based 2FA.
I'm not sure about whehter you still require SMS in initial account
setup for Google. It has been too long since I moved my 2FA to use
non-SMS based techniques. I do notice that when I do login to google
from a new device/browser, the SMS option is still shown as one option,
but it is not the default/preferred option, only a fallback one.
I do still wonder though - if your so concerned about privacy and google
having your phone number, how you can be comfortable with them having
your email data?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-06 0:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 150+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-03 5:59 gmail+imap+smtp (oauth2) Uwe Brauer
2022-05-03 6:27 ` Jostein Kjønigsen
2022-05-03 20:44 ` Uwe Brauer
2022-05-04 7:22 ` Robert Pluim
2022-05-04 8:43 ` Tim Cross
2022-05-05 12:57 ` Uwe Brauer
2022-05-05 13:48 ` Robert Pluim
2022-05-08 14:36 ` Uwe Brauer
2022-05-08 16:00 ` Robert Pluim
2022-05-08 16:40 ` Uwe Brauer
2022-05-09 8:38 ` Robert Pluim
2022-05-10 6:29 ` Uwe Brauer
2022-05-10 8:13 ` Robert Pluim
2022-06-02 15:15 ` [app password does not work (at the moment)] (was: gmail+imap+smtp (oauth2)) Uwe Brauer
2022-06-02 15:37 ` [SOLVED (magic?)] (was: [app password does not work (at the moment)]) Uwe Brauer
2022-06-03 14:04 ` [SOLVED (magic?)] Robert Pluim
2022-06-06 6:49 ` Uwe Brauer
2022-06-06 7:47 ` Robert Pluim
2022-06-06 18:55 ` [SOLVED (magic?)] (was: [app password does not work (at the moment)]) Tomas Hlavaty
2022-06-06 19:07 ` tomas
2022-06-06 19:37 ` Tomas Hlavaty
2022-06-07 4:35 ` tomas
2022-06-07 5:52 ` Tomas Hlavaty
2022-06-07 7:09 ` [Clarification] (was: [SOLVED (magic?)]) Uwe Brauer
2022-06-07 10:02 ` Yuri Khan
2022-06-07 16:24 ` [Clarification] Uwe Brauer
2022-06-07 7:15 ` [SOLVED (magic?)] (was: [app password does not work (at the moment)]) tomas
2022-06-09 22:30 ` Richard Stallman
2022-06-07 5:44 ` [SOLVED (magic?)] Byung-Hee HWANG
2022-06-07 6:04 ` Tomas Hlavaty
2022-06-07 7:14 ` tomas
2022-06-09 22:29 ` Richard Stallman
2022-06-10 7:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-06-12 0:44 ` Richard Stallman
2022-06-12 5:02 ` tomas
2022-06-15 10:05 ` Richard Stallman
2022-06-09 22:30 ` Richard Stallman
2022-06-07 23:18 ` [SOLVED (magic?)] (was: [app password does not work (at the moment)]) Richard Stallman
2022-05-05 13:56 ` gmail+imap+smtp (oauth2) Tim Cross
2022-05-05 13:58 ` Filipp Gunbin
2022-05-05 20:13 ` Jorge A. Alfaro-Murillo
2022-05-05 21:44 ` Thomas Fitzsimmons
2022-05-06 0:43 ` Tim Cross
2022-05-06 8:01 ` Tomas Hlavaty
2022-05-06 9:04 ` Tim Cross
2022-05-06 11:38 ` Stefan Monnier
2022-05-06 12:02 ` tomas
2022-05-06 12:06 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-05-06 12:46 ` Stefan Monnier
2022-05-06 13:05 ` Tim Cross
2022-05-11 9:01 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-11 9:01 ` gmail+imap+smtp (davmail) Richard Stallman
2022-05-11 9:43 ` Eric S Fraga
2022-05-13 15:08 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-06 12:49 ` gmail+imap+smtp (oauth2) Tim Cross
2022-05-06 13:23 ` Eric S Fraga
2022-05-06 13:40 ` tomas
2022-05-06 12:34 ` Tim Cross
2022-05-06 12:34 ` Tim Cross
2022-05-06 16:49 ` Tomas Hlavaty
2022-05-06 16:41 ` Tomas Hlavaty
2022-05-06 16:38 ` Tomas Hlavaty
2022-05-06 18:55 ` Tim Cross
2022-05-06 19:57 ` Stefan Monnier
2022-05-08 23:36 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-09 0:26 ` Tim Cross
2022-05-10 6:53 ` Tomas Hlavaty
2022-05-11 9:04 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-11 23:38 ` Tomas Hlavaty
2022-05-12 9:16 ` Tomas Hlavaty
2022-05-12 16:51 ` Thomas Fitzsimmons
2022-05-15 23:37 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-12 7:10 ` Tomas Hlavaty
2022-05-12 9:03 ` Tomas Hlavaty
2022-05-06 23:18 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-06 10:30 ` Eric S Fraga
2022-05-08 23:37 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-09 5:13 ` tomas
2022-05-09 12:25 ` Eric S Fraga
2022-05-09 23:20 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-11 9:47 ` Eric S Fraga
2022-05-13 15:08 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-12 10:36 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-13 6:58 ` Eric S Fraga
2022-05-16 23:25 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-12 14:12 ` Jorge A. Alfaro-Murillo
2022-05-13 8:57 ` Eric S Fraga
2022-05-13 18:49 ` Roland Winkler
2022-05-14 9:57 ` Eric S Fraga
2022-05-05 18:37 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-05 19:13 ` Stefan Monnier
2022-05-05 19:52 ` Stefan Monnier
2022-05-05 20:10 ` Uwe Brauer
2022-05-06 0:32 ` Tim Cross
2022-05-06 23:18 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-06 23:42 ` Brian Cully via Emacs development discussions.
2022-05-06 1:46 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-05-06 23:18 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-03 23:40 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-04 2:05 ` Tim Cross
2022-05-04 5:13 ` tomas
2022-05-04 13:34 ` Thomas Fitzsimmons
2022-05-04 14:38 ` Stefan Monnier
2022-05-04 14:58 ` Robert Pluim
2022-05-04 14:48 ` Tim Cross
2022-05-04 15:41 ` Thomas Fitzsimmons
2022-05-05 18:37 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-06 8:34 ` Tomas Hlavaty
2022-05-06 23:18 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-07 3:22 ` Tim Cross
2022-05-08 23:35 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-09 0:01 ` Tim Cross
2022-05-10 7:11 ` Tomas Hlavaty
2022-05-10 7:51 ` Tim Cross
2022-05-10 11:44 ` Tomas Hlavaty
2022-05-10 12:39 ` Tim Cross
2022-05-11 9:52 ` Eric S Fraga
2022-05-11 9:01 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-11 9:01 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-11 12:03 ` Tim Cross
2022-05-13 15:10 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-11 9:01 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-11 12:33 ` Tim Cross
2022-05-11 14:08 ` Tim Cross
2022-05-14 14:12 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-13 15:10 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-14 10:02 ` Eric S Fraga
2022-05-16 23:25 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-14 21:43 ` chad
2022-05-15 5:04 ` tomas
2022-05-05 18:36 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-06 0:37 ` Tim Cross
2022-05-04 15:35 ` Óscar Fuentes
2022-05-04 15:48 ` Robert Pluim
2022-05-04 16:01 ` Óscar Fuentes
2022-05-04 16:48 ` Tim Cross
2022-05-05 18:36 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-05 21:34 ` Brian Cully via Emacs development discussions.
2022-05-05 22:13 ` Stefan Monnier
2022-05-06 23:18 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-06 0:54 ` Tim Cross [this message]
2022-05-06 2:21 ` Brian Cully via Emacs development discussions.
2022-05-06 23:18 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-06 23:19 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-06 23:47 ` Brian Cully via Emacs development discussions.
2022-05-04 16:45 ` Tim Cross
2022-05-04 16:33 ` Tim Cross
2022-05-06 23:17 ` Richard Stallman
2022-05-04 17:01 ` Cesar Crusius
2022-05-05 1:57 ` Tim Cross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wnezqxsy.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=theophilusx@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=ofv@wanadoo.es \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).