From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Akib Azmain Turja Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Survey 2022 - design Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2022 14:00:04 +0600 Message-ID: <87wn9gdnnf.fsf@disroot.org> References: <87ee0sb3by.fsf@gmail.com> <874jwma9cy.fsf@tecosaur.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27772"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Timothy Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 04 10:28:52 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ofdIK-0006xL-Ed for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 10:28:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59998 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ofdII-0006VM-Nd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 04:28:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42660) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ofcr5-0004go-Jw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 04:00:46 -0400 Original-Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:47668) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ofcr3-000515-5y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 04:00:43 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C144C779; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 10:00:38 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Original-Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nNZztkFPt7fX; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 10:00:37 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1664870430; bh=SWXYGGo7ITxy1cgnilOiL8Bic9m2ULc7ezmWSTp7yyI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=SUG8/IiBhmVwgDPlY+s1MrgeuN52+F1A4/JOg0yhUtbO7qIZykdH2ZAQD9lU5Zvoo 0XSg0AYGA3bNBX6AXYJOUiz9kfY8rslaKWLsmdRUtfkXQh1Lhwbv67+qBMI35miX2P JWqnFgvmpDh/+NLSdiRT6O8si5l9PDOUGcB66E4xoPks7UewVjYtR11zLr93Vv/hzD KG+UH7CYx319tGkip08dPSe4VPBy935qmlcwRR4VsatGzUXffsBNCbTlSp7emA7Qyc fpLQZdbSdUezIRS/H6aJRoJrO/c2gv4DuxQv7jJ2CpXNX1Dx40w6qKLuygXHPzNTEf kZTB43LnU/yVA== In-Reply-To: <874jwma9cy.fsf@tecosaur.net> (Timothy's message of "Sun, 02 Oct 2022 16:30:48 +0800") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=178.21.23.139; envelope-from=akib@disroot.org; helo=knopi.disroot.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:296857 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Timothy writes: > Hi All, > > If any of you are wondering what happened to this, it has not been forgot= ten > about! My very competitive todo list just pushed this on the backburner f= or a > while. > > I=E2=80=99m returning to this now though, and hopefully will start testin= g the > deployment and promoting the survey shortly (probably over the next few w= eeks). > > If anybody has last-minute =E2=80=9CI really think you should change/add/= remove this > question=E2=80=9D feedback, now would be the time to mention it. I think = the current > state of affairs is fairly decent though, and I don=E2=80=99t think it wo= uld be worth > bikeshedding the questions =F0=9F=98=9B =E2=80=94 we can always refine/im= prove next year. > > The current set of questions: > > > With regards to survey promotion, I=E2=80=99m thinking it would be good t= o mention this > as widely as possible to try to reach a diverse range of respondents. If = other > people might have ideas on how to effectively share this survey around, t= hat > would be great. > > All the best, > Timothy > Everything looks good, except the following question: =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- RadioSelect(:respondent_education, "What is the highest level of education you have completed?", ["High school" =3D> "School", "Associate's Degree" =3D> "Associates", "Bachelor's Degree" =3D> "Bachelors", "Master's Degree" =3D> "Masters", "PhD or equivalent" =3D> "PhD"], mandatory=3Dfalse), =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- What if someone is still in high school? =2D-=20 Akib Azmain Turja Find me on Mastodon at @akib@hostux.social. This message is signed by me with my GnuPG key. Its fingerprint is: 7001 8CE5 819F 17A3 BBA6 66AF E74F 0EFA 922A E7F5 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEyVTKmrtL6kNBe3FRVTX89U2IYWsFAmM76AQACgkQVTX89U2I YWsZhw/8DPNFa4G2D043+LhQqBZEn61wXpdNB5ZpgwtT5gXQgXmOu/zj63zdBE/f G+UD5ZFeG7lq/cxtP1mUxgojodZOQMPil9n+ZSyMq+pvJq4EQzHKrXLhVzhzaA4H pB4LKKQuKCLoS6H7GKekRu2qBjLcyiCSpG5bnIZQUasSLfth7U4uEWc7VVIkvXoW Gn0sYFtjiAFXPD1yF+SpqM9EWnoTC71Qeq0bcZNI03goSL7qZXKo0WR9uliffAOZ eTtXMuYVYetvqu5mt4HIReTuy3vv3QjCAhuTvXmLDdxT0VKnM9115gCdBahM2PVx uXRx6EyQfo6bf5D5fPh9aFOSTNMSaar53q+iTRfr2HdR8rVLK03fTS6sJlBd8Qey KAEbEsIQJIEmr1diaBl4ajzyZ0z1INScn76zsaok7VyPZX0r4CaO2J8eXNE76brW BxrJyCPv6B+lYKlKg96Xj885M414e6HbMkqeckJ1O6LJoD3wa6PqZFG8qkQSVC/H 8c1B8Ov+BQXRIa67qpLS/2agKzh9Wl6U5TTFeaBiIrAZ85TZSXl5zahvEUyysTzg 01mLJoIXR7Z2dS4MRFnSAruBMKPR+SMTA4SOSzFmY6HmAER2tEurF2DG2VqTyu57 5epgfRG/XPXTevfMxBRv27z/xyTgLB47lnvR3X9Jj38z7UnecVI= =CfU5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--