From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Standardized access to a REPL Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 09:25:53 +0000 Message-ID: <87wn7qc6zi.fsf@posteo.net> References: <0249C656-21C8-49F2-B979-A1894BF80637@gmail.com> <874juvhoyi.fsf@posteo.net> <72C5E060-76D5-45C7-80E8-C794468DAAB8@gmail.com> <87o7t35sjm.fsf@posteo.net> <87zgcnkmvq.fsf@posteo.net> <87pmdilyb1.fsf@posteo.net> <8335ae9auz.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37431"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , casouri@gmail.com, jostein@secure.kjonigsen.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org, theo@thornhill.no, jostein@kjonigsen.net To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 20 10:26:13 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1owgab-0009R4-06 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 10:26:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1owgaU-0000mq-Uv; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 04:26:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1owgaK-0000kz-Ku for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 04:25:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1owgaJ-000266-7e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 04:25:56 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9388F240026 for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 10:25:53 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1668936353; bh=UB0xqZ/iRMF8dh+lfwD+kUzb3IKInF6D1D+0TSzH9Mg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=SQxf+e01TpeUjmOyTByOz57SONVi9Uxpn4+1OH7nYx/4sUN9hD87TbFVV3qz1dsPD HHSLGdb0Tm28+9wEBDoyameo1uTgymBwDKkz3gagtTU0Ol2yLwfZ+2sjmlkIO+/dIG qo4xO0UOhx+9IUlwgAEQm8wu9kGtuRYX6n8u9E5OlYDGnHnt3fkN7MyX2eJ1fZUV// s+lR6uXR4wDhWS/Ap0peNHfnt5tuDhf8mu7W7FApar3mLrOdoywSYH0ziC3vLBNulE BI4hzBZdLVPOSGu8QxOLR9o6+gRALMSQ6diqn0eNb8iw6DaTrSBt28fF/Z5Gg5p7wd MNmWZGf2RHYMg== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4NFQ9r17P9z6tmh; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 10:25:52 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sat, 19 Nov 2022 17:31:23 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:300237 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> "C-c C-c" doesn't mean DWIM, it means "I'm done with whatever I was >> doing, use the result as appropriate". > > I agree, and I suspect Philip agrees as well :-) Yes, I didn't phrase that perfectly. What I had in mind was Org's usage of C-c C-c that is context sensitive.