From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Package "luwak" Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2022 09:05:49 +0000 Message-ID: <87wn74sxzm.fsf@posteo.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9786"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Will Mengarini , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 06 10:07:03 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p2Tuo-0002L6-V6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 10:07:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p2Ttk-0000Lm-Jb; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 04:05:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p2Tti-0000LN-Um for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 04:05:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p2Tth-0005CX-3D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 04:05:54 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC619240101 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 10:05:50 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1670317550; bh=qU5cdlzTuKPWoPKvsRh/PjDPLGv2RuvishbyDMfDZEA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=beruvbIgqepw2gw7kjh/nSt5L4gYlH7/Iv17dh16Fq6DZe0h8UNuRSlkbivvVKGlw Pk/vSt/h7QvAmlW9l/WNh9YPq6Fm04i/WLLpJMHp89f14zrsvKaexe+1+eQri0nI6w 5IwFEpIgXe6vBDq+S4blwXEK/fFK6kOtCGEyu9en2AyTvnkJFavUMVkaxZsWXm4ff6 YYHm0/cC7t74hMEgnHnMaidermAMrt7Cz0iY7z86WYu2LqZlixi00t9eKbwquSEhF5 j479yyqM20tGMYj83eJDF9ULY18vafewRqpPt1lUlvXBts+ispMxd5TfrRUYUfkVqq H9f8h/B0NyUxg== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4NRDzK1bWLz6tmp; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 10:05:46 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Mon, 05 Dec 2022 17:30:32 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:300954 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] > [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] > [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > > > The name "eww" is also unhelpful. Perhaps > > the merger should be under the name "lynx". > > Does EWW work using lynx? If so, that would be a good idea. We would > replace two unhelpful package names with one name that would be > helpful and easy to remember. No it doesn't, EWW uses shr (Simple HTML Renderer) to display websites. > If EWW does not work using lynx, then renaming it to `lynx' would be > misleading at one level. We might rather make a different choice. EWW has been around for a while (I belive 24.4), I don't think it is viable to rename it now. > What other packages do we have for looking at web pages? I see there > is `browse-url'. Is that an alternative to EWW, or just a higherlevel > confugurable interface to EWW and other options? No, browse-url is a generic system for requesting a URL be opened in some browser, be it Firefox, Chrome, EWW, or whatever the default settings are on a system. > Are there any more web-browsing packages that we should consider in > this planning? None that I know of.