From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Indentation and gc Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 15:45:36 +0000 Message-ID: <87wn3ky7rz.fsf@localhost> References: <20230310110747.4hytasakomvdyf7i.ref@Ergus> <20230310110747.4hytasakomvdyf7i@Ergus> <87a60k657y.fsf@web.de> <838rg4zmg9.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttys4dge.fsf@web.de> <83sfebyepp.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttyru4zt.fsf@web.de> <83fsabyb41.fsf@gnu.org> <87mt4jtpqf.fsf@web.de> <83ilf7wi48.fsf@gnu.org> <878rg3wh2f.fsf@localhost> <83cz5fwggd.fsf@gnu.org> <871qlvwg1s.fsf@localhost> <83a60jwf9l.fsf@gnu.org> <871qluuk3y.fsf@localhost> <831qluuj7e.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8j6t3i9.fsf@localhost> <83v8j6t2ib.fsf@gnu.org> <87zg8gbsch.fsf@localhost> <838rg0u0fd.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26720"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: arne_bab@web.de, spacibba@aol.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 13 16:44:48 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pbkLw-0006ir-0N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 16:44:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pbkLR-0002c2-Ow; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 11:44:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pbkLN-0002bm-Jk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 11:44:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pbkLJ-00061K-It for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 11:44:12 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8C5B240343 for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 16:44:06 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1678722246; bh=9gyNcPkWmzmAytMt8Xq0qSDrwl1xCvahhnNRUzd+E6k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=ST/HRumE2f6syuCdlYJpvB54dakJn/Spj9dKEricoFAJZ5RI4jiBPweXzbe289RrI sq5iJeFEnXfeLOsZyr78WyrsOwvU4cPRZCWdDWu9vgRccGlSCsnU/5o1hjVKV4AVlv nQzZtfgL1zyouzOdEdDl9RQcebfYwaUSjReXO+BTfQkW+SfBBD/PoqQTtyVk5iwRH7 yOJccxCyJ2pwTYsVRtqgmBkO1KOXTG/lO0hs+FiBTA7SUOW6s5y3rGquqCtudrB4ia +SKci/jqi7AQiTDEa1Cz1LZ20uGX/z4Ef/DKkmP0FHLTHA6V0bpSmlGS3d0MmT/MY4 p5kmmeze5RD8A== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Pb1D60mCwz6tpH; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 16:44:05 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <838rg0u0fd.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:304403 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> See the attached statistics data example. >> >> WDYT? > > Looks useful, thanks. Feel free to share the ideas on what else we could record there. Once we decide what kind of data we want to collect, I can announce the package, asking people to report the statistics. >> > If the Emacs memory usage in system monitor is 1.7 Gib, how come >> > memory-limit says it's 6.5 GiB? >> >> 6.5Gib is virtual memory. 1.7Gib is actually used memory - the value >> people usually mean when considering memory footprint. > > You mean, the process has a 6.5 GiB footprint, out of which only 1.7 > GiB are being used, and the rest is free? That'd mean awfully > inefficient libc implementation of malloc. I mean the following output for "top" bash command PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 31838 yantar92 20 0 1843744 800648 121684 S 0.3 5.0 1:12.48 emacs VIRT is virtual memory and RES (or %MEM) is actually used. Except that this one is 20 minutes uptime and 6.5GiB is after 2 days, stabilizing earlier. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at