From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Proposal for 'package-isolate' command Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2023 20:28:47 +0000 Message-ID: <87wmxpsbk0.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87r0oftgye.fsf@posteo.net> <87350vt1wz.fsf@posteo.net> <871qgen1ln.fsf@posteo.net> <87edke4mou.fsf@posteo.net> <87wmy6kuan.fsf@posteo.net> <87wmy6w070.fsf@posteo.net> <87zg2sjleg.fsf@posteo.net> <87pm3nlbm7.fsf@posteo.net> <87zg2ri9g9.fsf@posteo.net> <87bkf7b7ls.fsf@posteo.net> <87v8dfi6zy.fsf@posteo.net> <877cpvb361.fsf@posteo.net> <87pm3mj0ot.fsf_-_@posteo.net> <87v8de9qel.fsf@posteo.net> <87pm3mgj8d.fsf@posteo.net> <877cpq9p7s.fsf@posteo.net> <878ra5d70p.fsf@posteo.net> <871qfxtv3v.fsf@posteo.net> <87h6otttfa.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16922"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Thierry Volpiatto Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 20 22:29:17 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qXp2y-0004C4-K5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 22:29:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qXp2d-0000fg-O6; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 16:28:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qXp2c-0000fH-ER for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 16:28:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qXp2a-0004QR-Ac for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 16:28:54 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ABA1240028 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 22:28:51 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1692563331; bh=Trwgk25OkLd6eel9N+IaZwl8tByeq+Qj4iAXNyj7p4Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=lBXTd5KcWYniUjJ4qpiMZKBLJphu+G3Ece9S1TuY/CX6suL2+sWu750JmQ44W8D4R vtW6njFlban8Ns+rjjSsVTNNcpGutav5t10+5iNw6O6VNQJWwFshZYWb94dFlfNq6x 9xgEIPMWRm3K50TUNnzP9Qh/SfBBNxY01YKlKr7rBNjHBM3xlF9zTu7RallLnQomrM 0pKojDD4OnMBb4xmk5TG4xba+2nVyb9iAcWVx9XKXkTmPUNiQZInWGKTpdNUcG7Cac 0KTK87/JwqjTgCKWaRTyQgT9NeA/0HAZZ5uZOk8GT4IIBIpTZkumm4Agnlk0yZyBkr URwjzYPcg531A== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4RTRyp4LZXz6tvh; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 22:28:50 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87h6otttfa.fsf@posteo.net> (Thierry Volpiatto's message of "Sun, 20 Aug 2023 19:15:28 +0000") Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; keydata= mDMEZBBQQhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAHJuofBrfqFh12uQu0Yi7mrl525F28eTmwUDflFNmdui0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiWBBMWCAA+FiEEDg7HY17ghYlni8XN8xYDWXahwukFAmQQUEICGwMFCQHhM4AFCwkI BwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQ8xYDWXahwulikAEA77hloUiSrXgFkUVJhlKBpLCHUjA0 mWZ9j9w5d08+jVwBAK6c4iGP7j+/PhbkxaEKa4V3MzIl7zJkcNNjHCXmvFcEuDgEZBBQQhIKKwYB BAGXVQEFAQEHQI5NLiLRjZy3OfSt1dhCmFyn+fN/QKELUYQetiaoe+MMAwEIB4h+BBgWCAAmFiEE Dg7HY17ghYlni8XN8xYDWXahwukFAmQQUEICGwwFCQHhM4AACgkQ8xYDWXahwukm+wEA8cml4JpK NeAu65rg+auKrPOP6TP/4YWRCTIvuYDm0joBALw98AMz7/qMHvSCeU/hw9PL6u6R2EScxtpKnWof z4oM Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -53 X-Spam_score: -5.4 X-Spam_bar: ----- X-Spam_report: (-5.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:308998 Archived-At: Thierry Volpiatto writes: > Philip Kaludercic writes: > >> An issue I see here, is that a required version might not be satisfied >> by the version of the package returned by `package-get-descriptor'. Or >> am I mistaken? > > So I guess we need a function that get the dependencies from installed > packages and one from all to fit with what we previously had. > If one wants to have all the dependencies for a given package not > already installed, there is actually nothing available. > Also `package-menu--list-to-prompt` is now wrong when used as prompt for > package-install. I think a sufficient solution might be just to extend `package-get-descriptor' with an optional MIN-VERSION argument. >> "Not easy" in the sense that you are not familiar with how it works, or >> thin k it shouldn't be used? All in all, `named-let' just compiles down >> to a cl-labels call, similar to the one you propose. > > Not familiar. Ok.