From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Reproducers for recent Emacs security issues Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 12:00:10 +0000 Message-ID: <87wmoy6dkl.fsf@localhost> References: <875xwk8w5w.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <706e1218-7451-4221-830a-ae3db3bf842e@gmail.com> <87cyqrf01x.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <87mspv6kf0.fsf@localhost> <87y19fdklq.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37775"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Sean Whitton , emacs-devel@gnu.org, team@security.debian.org To: Max Nikulin Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 15 14:00:39 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rwL0o-0009cR-5i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 14:00:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rwKzv-0007Yo-Rl; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 07:59:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rwKzv-0007YY-2f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 07:59:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rwKzn-0000JT-KG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 07:59:42 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34EB8240107 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 13:59:34 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1713182374; bh=WJRh7kUlY6mIZ5yBxeb20KoiFlIfAqnoFgh82nSqBNU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: From; b=RN9paHujxFggFnv/7AX/T/mchgfaJqCp+Kff41udTAf7TzIWo+SnTtPVDgSsabqVN eO7zyHyM0wM9BaQXdiX1Xoo18zET0moWPr+PmCyO/xGtwv3fzgyCMIE23bBnaqa6ra iArFjK71JVrdhNJiy2DstRIn4LoCQ9FJo9iwyZoJA+DGo8hF+bmwQObZuw8scCBoEw 36OrM3RkhQaruLMEMOKAdpHnOwgnD0O9ZAnnfVSddnICt2jj/ItUpchQjURIWEOJd0 gHqXMasdwjvwyic+ulz02vjYT/zb1k2bTgTt3i5bgQg27z+u8wdiQ57caOoWnlZg4A WAl2abCYGDK6Q== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4VJ5Ls0QqQz9rxK; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 13:59:32 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:317734 Archived-At: Max Nikulin writes: > On 15/04/2024 16:46, Sean Whitton wrote: >> >> emacs -q >> M-x gnus-no-server >> Gf ~/tmp/mbox-with-the-msgs.mbox >> RET > > I am not a Gnus user, but this time I have tried it. I have realized > that if there is an text/x-org attachment, even a purely innocent one, > then it is enough to have the following in the text/plain *body* to > trigger an attempt to download a remote file: > > #+setupfile: http://localhost:8000/setup-1234567890.org > > it happens when I open the message, the attachment remains closed. > > I expect that message body should not affect attachment preview. This sounds like gnus bug (or feature?). I can also reproduce it. Feel free to submit it as a separate bug report. It does not affect the discussed vulnerability. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at