From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs website, Lisp, and other Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2024 06:29:11 +0200 Message-ID: <87wmkvpp7s.fsf@dataswamp.org> References: <87sevj9b50.fsf@jeremybryant.net> <871q33rj7v.fsf@dataswamp.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15506"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:lg8FNOQ4nZ2XveDqsTTHJs/fYts= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 05 13:02:23 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1savTp-0003qh-1s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2024 13:02:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1savTT-0000gz-GF; Mon, 05 Aug 2024 07:01:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sapLY-0001Es-It for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:29:24 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sapLW-0002LB-Vw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:29:24 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sapLU-0004Ek-58 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2024 06:29:20 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 05 Aug 2024 07:01:57 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:322357 Archived-At: > Lisp's superiority is a myth. Most pleasant to the people who have that inclination (they don't have to be similar in other areas). It is also Emacs, doing a file for some compiler in some other Lisp is fun, but not half as fun. Anyone remembers the Python editor Idle? That was so incredibly boring I still remember it! More fun, faster, more integrated, more to do, more variation. I think one can say. We can say that instead? But it's just a suggestion, if boasting about the programming language is what one should do, do it, I'm not bothered with it - on the contrary. And we can make it better, possibly. ______________________________ //````````````````````````````\\ $. new word order % $. -------------- % $. % $. string proximity by words % $. as a non-strict total order % \\____________________________// `^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^` -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal