From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Feng Shu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Question about minibuffer and child frames (Posframe) Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 17:46:32 +0800 Message-ID: <87wmikjldz.fsf@163.com> References: <87jzek200d.fsf@163.com> <875xq41kgm.fsf@163.com> <15f64df2-ae81-4d06-9c9a-964504c5a285@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39348"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Gerd =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F6llmann?= , Emacs Devel To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 07 11:47:42 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sxkL7-000A5M-PS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2024 11:47:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sxkKM-0007Bo-3D; Mon, 07 Oct 2024 05:46:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sxkKH-0007BV-RJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2024 05:46:51 -0400 Original-Received: from m16.mail.163.com ([220.197.31.4] helo=163.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sxkKC-0005bC-JV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2024 05:46:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; bh=dNEQcNOceggUtdsU3QHnrgu/mMOz/5/IxsMx4+HRYzk=; b=WVMJBnZnRzOA6khzjrq2JltEjavIgi4RDQxQstYBJHY1cpmt8h2p8rikEjOOa6 RicLq+GimlEfgWpTzZC1+W70GohBR0+37LkkRlc4wbcd9e2m+hkfC3aFzlm4EI5t I2IVIDWJYFLKO5tRpV00gHiLQRRUuQa/JhMM0ejmO8rQA= Original-Received: from Tumashu (unknown [218.92.14.78]) by gzga-smtp-mtada-g0-4 (Coremail) with SMTP id _____wD3n7b4rQNnEqWZBQ--.10256S2; Mon, 07 Oct 2024 17:46:32 +0800 (CST) In-Reply-To: <15f64df2-ae81-4d06-9c9a-964504c5a285@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Mon, 7 Oct 2024 10:35:11 +0200") X-CM-TRANSID: _____wD3n7b4rQNnEqWZBQ--.10256S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjDUn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUU529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7v73 VFW2AGmfu7bjvjm3AaLaJ3UbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvj4RWBTYDUUUU X-Originating-IP: [218.92.14.78] X-CM-SenderInfo: 5wxpt2lkx6il2tof0z/1tbiLwVx1GcDoEHgVAAAs+ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=220.197.31.4; envelope-from=tumashu@163.com; helo=163.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:324386 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: >> INTERNAL-BORDER-WIDTH and INTERNAL-BORDER-COLOR are same as >> BORDER-WIDTH and BORDER-COLOR, but do not suggest to use for the >> reason: >> >> Add distinct controls for child frames' borders (Bug#45620) >> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=ff7b1a133bfa7f2614650f8551824ffaef13fadc > > Do you mean separate child frame borders don't work? No, before child frame have it own border, posframe use internal-border, so we have both just for back compatibility. > > martin > --