From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: called by a process filter? Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 10:37:28 -0400 Message-ID: <87vf5ozf45.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: <87hdh81srh.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1115908408 28062 80.91.229.2 (12 May 2005 14:33:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 14:33:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Kevin Rodgers , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 12 16:33:25 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DWEjJ-0003hX-F6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 May 2005 16:32:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DWEsG-0004XX-Ma for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 May 2005 10:41:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DWEr0-00045a-6i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2005 10:39:58 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DWEqx-000449-CQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2005 10:39:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DWEqw-00043Y-Vn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2005 10:39:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.54] (helo=tomts10-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DWEvH-0002LU-9O; Thu, 12 May 2005 10:44:23 -0400 Original-Received: from alfajor ([67.68.217.114]) by tomts10-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20050512143729.YBBN26102.tomts10-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Thu, 12 May 2005 10:37:29 -0400 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4EE02D7301; Thu, 12 May 2005 10:37:28 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-Reply-To: (Kim F. Storm's message of "Thu, 12 May 2005 15:58:17 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:37036 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:37036 >> No, because the after-change-function is generic > I would expect it to be buffer local, and as such, it would only be > triggered by filter functions that update that buffer. Well, to tell you the truth, given the lack of info, I actually have no idea. My impression is that the OP is writing some kind of minor-mode-like thingy, so it may interact with more or less any filter function. But this impression is based on nothing, so I may be completely off-base. Stefan