From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Default face problem Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 09:58:53 -0400 Message-ID: <87vespalwf.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: <87bquicu9k.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87u08aapx5.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1146491974 24016 80.91.229.2 (1 May 2006 13:59:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 13:59:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: wilde@sha-bang.de, jyavner@member.fsf.org, storm@cua.dk, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 01 15:59:30 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FaYvw-0007dE-T5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 15:59:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FaYvw-0006jI-GD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 09:59:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FaYvT-0006YO-IY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 09:58:59 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FaYvQ-0006Uq-TR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 09:58:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FaYvQ-0006UQ-K3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 09:58:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.184] (helo=tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FaYzE-0007kA-SX; Mon, 01 May 2006 10:02:53 -0400 Original-Received: from alfajor ([70.55.146.223]) by tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20060501135854.GSXN10262.tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Mon, 1 May 2006 09:58:54 -0400 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 21432D8375; Mon, 1 May 2006 09:58:54 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Kenichi Handa In-Reply-To: (Kenichi Handa's message of "Mon, 01 May 2006 21:51:03 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53726 Archived-At: >> Yes, it is. But IIRC the font selection mechanism tries to distinguish >> between bitmap-scaled and vector-scaled fonts by checking the presence of >> another instance of the font, with a non-0 size (i.e. a bitmap font). > Which font selection mechanism do you mean here? At least, > Emacs doesn't do that. Emacs determines a font is > auto-scaled if it's RESY is not zero and POINT_SIZE is zero. Hmm... maybe I'm confusing things. At least I remember that at some point, there was a special case where a bitmap font of a slightly different size than requested was preferred over a scaled (whether bitmap or vector) font. Stefan