From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jay Belanger Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: pretest 22.0.100 Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 08:39:38 -0500 Message-ID: <87veerfu1x.fsf@gmail.com> References: <873b22nd3f.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <17992.54265.248694.83627@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <464C4F64.2030402@gnu.org> Reply-To: jay.p.belanger@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1179409190 14430 80.91.229.12 (17 May 2007 13:39:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 13:39:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jay.p.belanger@gmail.com To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 17 15:39:47 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HogCp-0000XT-IU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 May 2007 15:39:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HogKv-0007b5-Ce for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 May 2007 09:48:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HogKr-0007Z0-2E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 May 2007 09:48:05 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HogKq-0007YL-N1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 May 2007 09:48:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HogKq-0007YI-Co for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 May 2007 09:48:04 -0400 Original-Received: from s4.cableone.net ([24.116.0.230]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HogCj-0007Bu-FR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 May 2007 09:39:41 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain (unverified [24.117.100.184]) by S4.cableone.net (CableOne SMTP Service S4) with ESMTP id 108118552 for multiple; Thu, 17 May 2007 06:39:39 -0700 In-Reply-To: <464C4F64.2030402@gnu.org> (Jason Rumney's message of "Thu\, 17 May 2007 13\:49\:40 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NotAscii: charset=us-ascii X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 8, First 43, in=23, out=0, spam=0 X-External-IP: 24.117.100.184 X-Abuse-Info: Send abuse complaints to abuse@cableone.net X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:71237 Archived-At: Jason Rumney writes: ... > If it was deliberate, then it was not a mistake. And history shows that > Emacs has always had version numbers, not version strings. If that were the case, shouldn't 22.0.99 be followed by 22.0.991 rather than 22.0.990 or 22.0.100? Jay