From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: asynchronous parsing
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:39:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vdksizxt.fsf@lifelogs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: m37hx97y1s.fsf@verona.se
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:16:15 +0200 joakim@verona.se wrote:
j> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:04:20 -0400 Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA> wrote:
>>
>>>> I. Asynchronous parsing
SM> BTW, I'm interested in adding core-Emacs support for such parsing, so if
SM> you have any ideas about it, please share them. The way I see it, there
SM> should be a table-based parsing engine written in C running in
SM> a spearate thread, so the question are "what should the tables look
SM> like?", "what should the output look like?", "what should the engine
SM> look like?", "how should the asynchronous code synchronize with the rest
SM> of Emacs?". Any help along this effort would be welcome.
>>
>> Maybe it would make sense to make this engine the first implementation
>> of an asynchronous process in Emacs. We know we need general-purpose
>> asynchronous processes, it's been discussed many times. Doing it with a
>> parser, a read-only process with internal state, would be a good start.
>> The difference from your suggestion is that rather than implementing a
>> one-off, the goal becomes the first cut of a general facility.
>>
>> I bring this up because the need for asynchronous processes keeps coming
>> up in Gnus discussions...
j> Sounds very interesting, how would that work?
The same way Stefan's suggestion would work: a separate thread running
this parser. The difference is that we don't just do one thread for the
parser and code especially for that purpose, but instead think of a
general thread facility the parser can use. Once we prototype the
facility, we'll know better what works and what doesn't.
The specifics of the parser, if that's what you're curious about, are
not important to me (I don't plan to write such parsers or configure
them myself). I just need the general threading facility for Gnus work.
Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-12 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 122+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-09 23:34 Why js2-mode in Emacs 23.2? Deniz Dogan
2009-08-09 23:38 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-09 23:46 ` Daniel Colascione
2009-08-09 23:50 ` Deniz Dogan
2009-08-09 23:56 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-09 23:56 ` Daniel Colascione
2009-08-09 23:55 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-09 23:58 ` Daniel Colascione
2009-08-10 0:00 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-10 0:06 ` Daniel Colascione
2009-08-10 0:17 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-10 0:46 ` Daniel Colascione
2009-08-10 0:55 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-10 0:18 ` Leo
2009-08-10 0:49 ` Daniel Colascione
2009-08-10 7:06 ` Carsten Dominik
2009-08-10 8:44 ` Leo
2009-08-10 8:54 ` CHENG Gao
2009-08-10 9:26 ` Leo
2009-08-10 10:22 ` Richard Riley
2009-08-10 15:21 ` eval-after-load not harmful after all (Was: Re: Why js-2mode?) Daniel Colascione
2009-08-10 17:01 ` Drew Adams
2009-08-10 17:21 ` eval-after-load not harmful after all Stefan Monnier
2009-08-11 0:43 ` eval-after-load not harmful after all (Was: Re: Why js-2mode?) Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-08-11 0:46 ` Drew Adams
2009-08-11 14:06 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-08-11 15:08 ` eval-after-load not harmful after all Stefan Monnier
2009-08-16 21:43 ` Leo
2009-08-17 0:34 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-17 11:44 ` Leo
2009-08-17 11:55 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-17 12:26 ` Leo
2009-08-17 14:40 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-11 0:53 ` eval-after-load not harmful after all (Was: Re: Why js-2mode?) Lennart Borgman
2009-08-11 3:06 ` Daniel Colascione
2009-08-11 9:17 ` Leo
2009-08-11 14:37 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-08-10 10:41 ` Why js2-mode in Emacs 23.2? Carsten Dominik
2009-08-10 13:04 ` Leo
2009-08-10 14:55 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-08-11 1:13 ` Glenn Morris
2009-08-11 3:02 ` Daniel Colascione
2009-08-11 4:28 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2009-08-11 4:33 ` Daniel Colascione
2009-08-11 4:39 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2009-08-11 4:45 ` Daniel Colascione
2009-08-11 4:37 ` Glenn Morris
2009-08-10 2:47 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-08-10 2:55 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-10 13:12 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-08-10 0:32 ` Leo
2009-08-10 0:48 ` Daniel Colascione
2009-08-10 2:55 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-08-10 3:24 ` Miles Bader
2009-08-10 3:27 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-10 3:45 ` Daniel Colascione
2009-08-10 5:18 ` Jason Rumney
2009-08-10 5:51 ` Xah Lee
2009-08-10 6:22 ` Xah Lee
2009-08-10 6:59 ` Miles Bader
2009-08-10 11:01 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-10 17:35 ` "Font-lock is limited to text matching" is a myth Daniel Colascione
2009-08-10 18:04 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-10 20:42 ` David Engster
2009-08-10 20:51 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-10 22:06 ` Eric M. Ludlam
2009-08-10 22:19 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-11 1:50 ` Eric M. Ludlam
2009-08-11 6:47 ` Steve Yegge
2009-08-11 9:17 ` Miles Bader
2009-08-11 12:13 ` Daniel Colascione
2009-08-11 14:37 ` Miles Bader
2009-08-11 14:49 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-11 14:57 ` Daniel Colascione
2009-08-11 14:53 ` Daniel Colascione
2009-08-11 15:08 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-11 15:36 ` Miles Bader
2009-08-11 15:56 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-08-11 15:54 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-11 17:00 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-08-11 17:19 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-11 15:57 ` Miles Bader
2009-08-11 17:06 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-08-11 14:50 ` Chong Yidong
2009-08-11 15:06 ` Daniel Colascione
2009-08-11 15:11 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-11 15:16 ` Daniel Colascione
2009-08-11 15:44 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-11 18:04 ` joakim
2009-08-11 18:08 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-11 19:12 ` joakim
2009-08-11 17:09 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-08-11 16:04 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-08-11 18:10 ` Edward O'Connor
2009-08-12 1:58 ` Steve Yegge
2009-08-12 13:48 ` Chong Yidong
2009-08-12 16:07 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-12 22:08 ` Steve Yegge
2009-08-14 1:22 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-08-12 2:16 ` Eric M. Ludlam
2009-08-12 6:43 ` Miles Bader
2009-08-12 11:28 ` Xah Lee
2010-11-23 14:43 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-08-12 15:21 ` asynchronous parsing (was: "Font-lock is limited to text matching" is a myth) Ted Zlatanov
2009-08-12 17:16 ` asynchronous parsing joakim
2009-08-12 19:39 ` Ted Zlatanov [this message]
2009-08-12 20:01 ` joakim
2009-08-13 2:51 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-08-13 14:51 ` Ted Zlatanov
2009-08-11 19:48 ` "Font-lock is limited to text matching" is a myth Lennart Borgman
2009-08-10 18:47 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-08-10 18:55 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-11 3:33 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-08-10 14:49 ` Why js2-mode in Emacs 23.2? Stefan Monnier
2009-08-10 6:46 ` Deniz Dogan
2009-08-10 14:53 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-08-10 14:05 ` Stephen Eilert
2009-08-10 14:37 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-10 14:42 ` Deniz Dogan
2009-08-10 19:12 ` Stephen Eilert
2009-08-10 14:41 ` Deniz Dogan
2009-08-10 14:57 ` Lennart Borgman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87vdksizxt.fsf@lifelogs.com \
--to=tzz@lifelogs.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).