From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Language identification Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 13:13:13 +0900 Message-ID: <87vdk7tfza.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <87skfczqc8.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87y6p45n4m.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1251518695 6549 80.91.229.12 (29 Aug 2009 04:04:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 04:04:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, joakim@verona.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 29 06:04:48 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MhFBA-0000gA-A8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 06:04:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52624 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MhFB9-0002yu-Pm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 00:04:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MhFB3-0002xI-N7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 00:04:33 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MhFAx-0002oq-FX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 00:04:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44098 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MhFAx-0002oZ-5g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 00:04:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mtps02.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]:52332) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MhFAu-00025v-KW; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 00:04:24 -0400 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mtps02.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3D5A7FFA; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 13:04:23 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A0D5C1A2EBB; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 13:13:13 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 8.0.12-devo-585 under 21.5 (beta29) "garbanzo" 891381effa11+ XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:114817 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > Is there a reason why users don't use the existing reliable mechanism? Many of the authors don't use Emacs, is my guess.