From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Get rid of cut buffer code, any objections? Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:16:33 -0400 Message-ID: <87vd6tyshq.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <4C7A97E8.9090707@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283120269 3371 80.91.229.12 (29 Aug 2010 22:17:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 22:17:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jan =?utf-8?Q?Dj=C3=A4rv?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 30 00:17:47 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OpqCA-0006zG-JZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:17:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43693 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OpqB9-0000pG-Ko for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:16:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35121 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OpqB3-0000od-Ox for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:16:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OpqB2-0006JA-Ku for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:16:37 -0400 Original-Received: from pantheon-po23.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.117]:55465) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OpqB2-0006J1-JF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:16:36 -0400 Original-Received: from furry (173-9-75-145-NewEngland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.9.75.145]) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po23.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o7TMGZbH014017 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:16:35 -0400 Original-Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 390BF16D402; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:16:34 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <4C7A97E8.9090707@swipnet.se> ("Jan =?utf-8?Q?Dj=C3=A4rv=22's?= message of "Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:24:56 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:129404 Archived-At: Jan Dj=C3=A4rv writes: > I have started to remove cut-buffer support for X11 (nothing checked > in sofar). Are there any objections? Go for it. Don't forget NEWS.