From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [emacs-diffs-request@gnu.org: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 96, Issue 98] Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:56:43 -0500 Message-ID: <87vd3fzi90.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <834ob09ccq.fsf@gnu.org> <83zksr97gg.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1291082327 21152 80.91.229.12 (30 Nov 2010 01:58:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 01:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 30 02:58:41 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PNFUP-0001fF-Jv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 02:58:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34125 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PNFUP-0008Mv-6v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:58:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33937 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PNFSX-0006Jg-H1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:56:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PNFSW-0005rf-BN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:56:45 -0500 Original-Received: from pantheon-po26.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.121]:40097) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PNFSU-0005rO-H2; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:56:42 -0500 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp128036014248.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.248]) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po26.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id oAU1ufgh001661 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:56:41 -0500 Original-Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4C2EE1613C5; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:56:43 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83zksr97gg.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:54:23 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133246 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Glenn Morris >> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:09:48 -0500 >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> http://savannah.gnu.org/ >> >> There's been a SQL injection leading to leaking of encrypted >> passwords, some of them discovered by brute-force attack, leading in >> turn to project membership access. We're reinstalling the system and >> restoring the data from a safe backup, probably November 24th. Please >> prepare to recommit your changes since that date. > > Recommitting should be a piece of cake with bzr, right? I have checkouts of both the trunk and emacs-23 taken minutes before savannah went down: revisions 102543 and 100249 respectively. (Savannah went down just as I was committing to the trunk, and for a minute I thought my commit had somehow crashed *.gnu.org). So, a simple "bzr push" from the bound branches should do the trick?