From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: debbugs.el Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:42:43 +0900 Message-ID: <87vd09c5bw.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <8762sa9770.fsf@gmx.de> <87pqqibr30.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <877hcp1hok.fsf@kslab.red-bean.com> <87d3mhcmyl.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298594316 31228 80.91.229.12 (25 Feb 2011 00:38:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:38:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Karl Fogel , Michael Albinus , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 25 01:38:28 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PslhT-00042k-D5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 01:38:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47171 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PslhS-0003eP-Sl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 19:38:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44173 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PslhN-0003a1-Jc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 19:38:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PslhM-0004pG-GM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 19:38:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]:45052) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PslhM-0004on-5o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 19:38:20 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873259706AC; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:38:15 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4AEAA1A28D4; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:42:43 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <87d3mhcmyl.fsf@stupidchicken.com> X-Mailer: VM 8.1.93a under 21.5 (beta29) "garbanzo" f5a5501814f5 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.158.97.224 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:136460 Archived-At: Chong Yidong writes: > Karl Fogel writes: > > > Considering that improved access to debbugs.gnu.org helps GNU Emacs > > development itself, it might make sense to have this on trunk so that > > maintainers always have the latest version and don't have to do > > anything special to get it. > > If there is a strong concern that putting code on the package archive > makes it less accessible for Emacs developers, how about merging ELPA > into trunk builds? This doesn't help at the other end. If it's in trunk, Emacs developers will hack on it. If not, it's Somebody Else's Business[tm], and they are far less likely to do so. Thus-spake-the-voice-of-ten-years'-experiencely y'rs,