From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r108099: Silence byte-compiler warnings. Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 22:38:10 +0200 Message-ID: <87vckefhe5.fsf@gmx.de> References: <877gwuhgwx.fsf@gmx.de> <871un2h3lc.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1335991102 22425 80.91.229.3 (2 May 2012 20:38:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 20:38:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 02 22:38:21 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SPgJY-00067y-Q1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 22:38:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57562 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SPgJY-0007HW-6r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 16:38:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50293) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SPgJV-0007HK-Br for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 16:38:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SPgJT-00089S-O6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 16:38:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:50082) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SPgJT-00089O-Dp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 16:38:15 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 May 2012 20:38:13 -0000 Original-Received: from p57BB94F1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO detlef.gmx.de) [87.187.148.241] by mail.gmx.net (mp071) with SMTP; 02 May 2012 22:38:13 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3708877 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18iM3hRWNAi66YC5+W03biEstII+OC9Gj//XvyT6Y GBeAGhiq6VLjLm In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Wed, 2 May 2012 21:43:15 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 213.165.64.23 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:150229 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero writes: >> The real solution would be to exclude notification.el (and other >> packages) from byte compilation, if Emacs hasn't been compiled with >> D-Bus support. > > I don't think it's worth jumping through hoops just to silence a > warning, when a defvar will do. Sure, we shouldn't change the byte compiler just because of this. But if there would exist a mean to instruct the compiler, why not. > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma Best regards, Michael.