From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bill Wohler Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bzr Emacs question Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 09:47:31 -0800 Organization: Newt Software Message-ID: <87vccuuc3w.fsf@olgas.newt.com> References: <23373.1353776529@olgas.newt.com> <83pq32zyz5.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1353779280 13308 80.91.229.3 (24 Nov 2012 17:48:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 17:48:00 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 24 18:48:11 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TcJpo-0005pC-7r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 18:48:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50625 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TcJpd-0006ea-Ch for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 12:47:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54930) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TcJpa-0006Zp-MG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 12:47:55 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TcJpZ-0001jn-0R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 12:47:54 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:60537) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TcJpY-0001jM-QS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 12:47:52 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TcJpc-0005he-Ja for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 18:47:56 +0100 Original-Received: from c-24-6-48-5.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([24.6.48.5]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 18:47:56 +0100 Original-Received: from wohler by c-24-6-48-5.hsd1.ca.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 18:47:56 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 60 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-6-48-5.hsd1.ca.comcast.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ge4+ivh4F7kTTtinikqyTeVqnMQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155063 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 09:02:09 -0800 >> From: Bill Wohler >> >> I want to make an MH-E 8.3.1 release that corresponds to the Emacs 24.1 >> release. I thought that I would do this: >> >> bzr tag -r emacs-24.1 mh-e-8.3.1 >> >> But then when I run the following to get the proper workspace for >> creating a release: >> >> bzr up -r mh-e-8.3.1 >> >> I get this error: >> >> bzr: ERROR: branch has no revision cyd@gnu.org-20120610074146-e2dmv3euiqbajrxt >> bzr update --revision only works for a revision in the branch history >> >> What is wrong? > > A tag is not a revision-id by itself. Try > > bzr up -r tag:mh-e-8.3.1 Not surprisingly, that produces the same error. Note that "bzr help revisionspec" says: Alternately, [the revision] can be given without a keyword, in which case it will be checked as a revision number, a tag, a revision id, a date specification, or a branch specification, in that order. > (And I'm not sure you really want "up" and not some other command, but > that's another story.) What would you recommend as an alternative to "svn up -r"? >> On a related note, what command should I use to confirm the revision of >> the workspace? "svn info" provides this information but "bzr info" does >> not. > > Does "bzr revno" do what you want? I think so. After running "bzr up -r 108549" (the master revision that contains a merge of emacs-24.1), the --tree option was needed to show that version. Without --tree, the version for the head of the trunk was shown: $ bzr revno --tree 108549 $ bzr revno 111000 Thanks! -- Bill Wohler aka http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD