From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: pcase-memoize: equal first branch, yet different Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 15:13:48 +0100 Message-ID: <87vc96ylwj.fsf@web.de> References: <87hakv6tek.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1362492727 14121 80.91.229.3 (5 Mar 2013 14:12:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 14:12:07 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 05 15:12:30 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UCsbV-0006zY-06 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 15:12:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33274 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCsb9-00005F-8H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 09:12:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55162) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCsb0-0008WQ-9m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 09:12:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCsaz-0005Tj-4m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 09:11:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:63312) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCsay-0005TD-RL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 09:11:57 -0500 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([92.74.177.220]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MHowb-1UDgsJ22XN-004DOB; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 15:11:54 +0100 Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 04 Mar 2013 14:33:41 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:6yU9U5w54OIOIHzFrzaPZegZQ3QbRW9gzwlzyDNIU7N V5LbM50H+2Rz1ieE99eiWkzIHuu3CBTbMekzq1cw+h1lEUw+1P CqEf2yCQDSx5bHwPwbA5g9zUpQamNnncRGMlaEyKs7capmqxQY EfAssSZ4u8VbdWuukfsN2YVrxnFCH8JsfOHEO/TwXnqNPGoXEK SSRmlsRF7WWFXS4JH56NnPsrXnujranGzuNpCZGJno= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.11 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:157528 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > The message is just a warning, so you can ignore it. But the better > option is to try and fix the underlying problem and make sure pcase is > not expanded repeatedly. Ah, it's good to know that. > PS: Why do you use (interactive "e") if you then don't use the > `event' argument. I hope this was a rhetorical question ;-) No, there is no reason, thanks for the hint. Regards, Michael.