From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.orgmode Subject: Re: org-export raises stringp nil error Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 07:40:57 +0100 Message-ID: <87vc928kcm.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87ip539io1.fsf@nautilus.nautilus> <87zjye96ph.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1362724865 31338 80.91.229.3 (8 Mar 2013 06:41:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 06:41:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lele Gaifax , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 08 07:41:29 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UDqzg-00008E-EG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 07:41:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59977 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDqzK-0006N1-Hh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 01:41:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45364) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDqzG-0006Mw-Vn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 01:41:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDqzF-0006Or-9j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 01:41:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:57065) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDqzF-0006Oc-3o; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 01:41:01 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id 15so2049581wgd.4 for ; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 22:41:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=AJs0fM0wIEGdry9JgkIR8uGP/5gGXRohTdzlgvM1Eqw=; b=trkv+EsJDi1vSjLj5fPsT5x2ICz/a6/YuQCmNL1eR8NMW+WiG0ieGgUyVpUlTZv7/e 2VZbsaqpXf1mi5VkJbCcz3t54DMozthxkB4KoyAWS1jFgSy3rTPG+DYeE4h2WY63VcE6 EkB8pmXT9yQ9DvqrlQ/4vauFt6JIwdlIzyFOtu6kw8PcSiXf79a4uJAsuz6SsJ8RLE+z iE+zOngiooTh+YwjjScZ2OHYX6kg98/ao/8PNJL8HqgUrZssxt4NwUt/6kFSu52IQ82l pX8AzSnolrU75wR5leJfLPRNPIZIP9mjU6Hhcimq8e/BSo+skW90wEnE1C2klWuEsPji BPIA== X-Received: by 10.194.60.195 with SMTP id j3mr1579168wjr.33.1362724860122; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 22:41:00 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from bzg.localdomain (mar75-2-81-56-68-112.fbx.proxad.net. [81.56.68.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ej8sm37309098wib.9.2013.03.07.22.40.56 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Mar 2013 22:40:58 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by bzg.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 62EAF1C218DA; Fri, 8 Mar 2013 07:40:57 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Thu, 07 Mar 2013 20:36:33 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 74.125.82.49 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:157574 gmane.emacs.orgmode:67894 Archived-At: Glenn Morris writes: >> I assumed it was okay to fix bugs after the last pretest, is it so? > > No, it is not ok, and I don't know why you would think it is. I missed the distinction between "pretest" and "release candidate". > The reason for this policy is (obviously) to prevent inadvertently > introducing mistakes. This seems to be exactly what has bitten us in > this case, where your patch just reverts the change from > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-diffs/2013-02/msg00058.html > > Was that fixing a regression? I doubt it. I find it hard to draw a clear line between regressions and bugs, especially since Org 7.9.x versions are way behind the current Org master branch. > Please apply the first patch as soon as possible. Done. > The second includes stuff like deleting comments, declaring functions, > and changing autoload for "org-autoload". No, you may not apply this. > > If there were any fixes in there for important regression bugs against > Emacs 24.2, please make a separate patch with just those items. Those are not critical regressions, so I won't apply them. -- Bastien