From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: split-window as a command Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 16:45:04 +0200 Message-ID: <87vc7qebgv.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> References: <87ppy0p4cm.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <5167D3E8.8000903@gmx.at> <87obdkf097.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <51681696.7000405@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1365864315 27335 80.91.229.3 (13 Apr 2013 14:45:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 14:45:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Rand , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 13 16:45:19 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UR1he-0001Ud-9t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 16:45:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42330 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UR1hd-0002Cc-UP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 10:45:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41074) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UR1hY-0002CS-Lx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 10:45:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UR1hW-0004ze-6V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 10:45:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:53015) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UR1hV-0004zW-Ta for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 10:45:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.35]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MhOyy-1UEK6I3Ijy-00Menw for ; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 16:45:08 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2013 14:45:08 -0000 Original-Received: from i59F57B62.versanet.de (EHLO rosalinde.fritz.box) [89.245.123.98] by mail.gmx.net (mp035) with SMTP; 13 Apr 2013 16:45:08 +0200 X-Authenticated: #20778731 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18NOBIZ4yQNEOrIje+kqw8w3DJGUzwseb+t1x49rV dqkirpJxzVDN56 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 12 Apr 2013 22:10:51 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158882 Archived-At: On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 22:10:51 -0400 Stefan Monnier wrote: >> It may be superfluous but it has always been a command and >> removing the interactive form would break existing keybindings >> and usage. > > Let's remove the `interactive' spec and see what kind of breakage > comes along. Done. To Rand: hope it doesn't hurt too much, but feel free to complain if it does ;-). (I already changed an old binding of split-window I had in my initializations.) Steve Berman