From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nic Ferrier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lexical-binding defined by the caller not the called? Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 18:50:19 +0100 Message-ID: <87vc76r1d0.fsf@ferrier.me.uk> References: <87a9oisxp5.fsf@ferrier.me.uk> <87txmq27nc.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> <8738uasqlk.fsf@ferrier.me.uk> <87ppxe21al.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1367171441 3273 80.91.229.3 (28 Apr 2013 17:50:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 17:50:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Pascal J. Bourguignon" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 28 19:50:41 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UWVkH-0000v5-Ek for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 19:50:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58494 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UWVkH-0003XI-3V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 13:50:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56806) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UWVkC-0003XA-F5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 13:50:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UWVk9-0006pF-OT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 13:50:36 -0400 Original-Received: from static.17.66.46.78.clients.your-server.de ([78.46.66.17]:44232 helo=po1.ferrier.me.uk) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UWVk9-0006p5-Hi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 13:50:33 -0400 Original-Received: from nferrier (140.35.155.90.in-addr.arpa [90.155.35.140]) by po1.ferrier.me.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5383AC03F8; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 20:00:18 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from nferrier (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nferrier (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84F891600B7; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 18:50:19 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: <87ppxe21al.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> (Pascal J. Bourguignon's message of "Sun, 28 Apr 2013 16:10:58 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 78.46.66.17 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:159198 Archived-At: "Pascal J. Bourguignon" writes: > Nic Ferrier writes: >> How do I check for lexical-binding then? > > Read again the code I posted along. I did. I can't see how that shows me how to test lexical-binding though. It seems like I can't tell if I'm executing in a lexical-binding environment or not. I want to be able to write a macro that understands when it is, or is not, executing code inside a lexical-binding environment.