From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christopher Schmidt Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: completion.el users? Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 16:09:19 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <87vc6p8sdi@ch.ristopher.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1368284972 20522 80.91.229.3 (11 May 2013 15:09:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 15:09:32 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 11 17:09:32 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UbBQR-0005YC-AQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 May 2013 17:09:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48107 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UbBQQ-00066o-Hq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 May 2013 11:09:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59898) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UbBQL-00066g-7T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2013 11:09:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UbBQI-0007Vj-Nq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2013 11:09:25 -0400 Original-Received: from ristopher.com ([146.185.21.93]:46825 helo=saturn.ch.ristopher.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UbBQI-0007Ve-FT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2013 11:09:22 -0400 Original-Received: by saturn.ch.ristopher.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id E201C201A3; Sat, 11 May 2013 16:09:19 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ch.ristopher.com; s=mail; t=1368284959; bh=X8u3OkvGPsyBGAM/hr2kSqLNbyg/NBvu53ytduEXCX8=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Date; b=JUtqdAVm6wwRiHJPl5RR4oZoWkDMQHFaOI1z1kLAHyPh9FYXXW8MMWNKSgXwRugJm j5YqwftLA5QK7XbfmfetUFtSePookUlKmF5oXO3Ide9tE2dNd7V7XLQrWOG4MrFpvI kcKb3mHdvzzaYFI23pf9A1SR0t69y1mgxTkEWCYE= In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 10 May 2013 15:44:05 -0400") Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x X-Received-From: 146.185.21.93 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:159505 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > IOW, I'd be happy to declare it obsolete. There are some people left who enable dynamic-completion-mode in their init.el. https://github.com/search?q=dynamic-completion-mode&type=Code AFAICT most people use auto-complete-mode, though. http://cx4a.org/software/auto-complete/ https://github.com/search?q=auto-complete-mode&type=Code I think auto-complete-mode is superior to completion.el. Christopher